Skip to comments.
Schumer Says U.N. Building Is a Danger
New York Sun ^
| August 28, 2006
| JOSEPH GOLDSTEIN
Posted on 08/28/2006 6:36:22 PM PDT by JBGUSA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: arthurus
Outer Mongolia is actually developing nicely as a democracy. How about Riyadh, Saudi Arabia or Tuktuyutok, NWT Canada or Baker Lake, Nunavut, Canada?
21
posted on
08/28/2006 6:51:07 PM PDT
by
JBGUSA
(If it's us or them, I choose us.)
To: pissant
Yes, but make sure John Bolton is elsewhere. We need him!
To: JBGUSA
Get the UN the heck out of the US, already. Move it to France where it belongs.
23
posted on
08/28/2006 6:53:18 PM PDT
by
Bullish
( The pig headed monkeys of Islam can kiss my grits!)
To: trustandobey
Yes. He can be the guest of honor in the demolition crane when it starts swinging the large ball.
24
posted on
08/28/2006 6:55:02 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: JBGUSA; arthurus
Outer Mongolia is actually developing nicely as a democracy. How about Riyadh, Saudi Arabia or Tuktuyutok, NWT Canada or Baker Lake, Nunavut, Canada? How about Gander, Newfoundland? I hear they're trying to increase air traffic to their airport.
To: JBGUSA
Don't worry. If there is a fire, or other disaster, at the UN building, the answer is: The NYFD should not respond.
26
posted on
08/28/2006 6:58:26 PM PDT
by
punster
To: JBGUSA
We call Chuckie Schumerde the PUTZ.
27
posted on
08/28/2006 7:01:36 PM PDT
by
punster
To: JBGUSA
GOOD. CONDEMN THE BUILDING AND LET IT DISINTEGRATE
MOVE THE UN TO SUDAN
28
posted on
08/28/2006 7:03:40 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Mr. Mojo
Yup, it's the residents. Let's move 'em to Gitmo and tear the building down.
29
posted on
08/28/2006 7:07:44 PM PDT
by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: JBGUSA
firefighters and Turtle Bay residents who might be exposed to asbestos in the event of an emergency at the U.N.,Senator Schumer said.We can avoid that problem by making sure the demolition team wears hazmat gear when they take the building down. The implosion might cause airborne particles, but this is a problem 99.999% of Americans would get behind and solve.
30
posted on
08/28/2006 7:18:46 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: JBGUSA
$1.9 Billion!?!? For some chicken wire and some two by fours? Gimme a break. Move the chicken coop to Geneva or Fallujah. The U.N. has outlived whatever it was created to do.
31
posted on
08/28/2006 7:24:32 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(What changes do you intend to make to your lifestyle now that Pluto is no longer "a planet?")
To: JBGUSA
All that is needed is for the U.N. to draft a strongly-worded resolution imploring the building to cease disintegration immediately.
That will take care of it all. How nice we can feel then.
32
posted on
08/28/2006 7:27:58 PM PDT
by
WireAndWood
(DNC: if it weren't for groupthink we'd have no think at all.)
To: JBGUSA
It sounds like the building should be condemned by the city and demolished. I'd support moving the UN Headquarters to Kabul. It would be a great jobs program for the region, and most UN members would be a lot closer to home.
-PJ
To: JBGUSA
For once, Chuckie may just be right. Now would be a great time to ship all of the Usless Nations to France. Let them build them a new building and care for it as well.
34
posted on
08/28/2006 7:38:16 PM PDT
by
DakotaRed
(The legacy of the left, "Screw you, I got mine.")
To: gaijin
How about Geneva? Without the US? The UN doesn't need a neutral country, they need an entire neutral continent. The US should offer to pay for their first year's cost for penguin repellant.
35
posted on
08/28/2006 7:41:02 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(UN Security Council resolution 1701: I believe it is ceasefire for our time.)
To: tje
How about beirut? Perfect location. It's multicultural and every thing. It's got Shiites, Sunnis, Druze and the odd Christian or three. The UN should fit right in.
36
posted on
08/28/2006 10:05:27 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: JBGUSA
Those places are uncomfortably too near the old neighborhood.
37
posted on
08/29/2006 6:30:17 AM PDT
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE)
To: JBGUSA
"Schumer Says U.N. Building Is a Danger'
I rarely agree with the fascist gungrabber, but he's right that the UN is dangerous.
And unlike Bolton's idea of chopping off the top 10 floors of the UN Marxist compound, I'd go for the first 10 floors and see what happens to the rest of the building.
Tank you.
38
posted on
08/29/2006 6:46:59 AM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(Gov. Jennifer Granholm's campaign slogan: Four more years of Uncle Joe and Uncle Ho)
To: sergeantdave
sergeantdave wrote: "Schumer Says U.N. Building Is a Danger' - I rarely agree with the fascist gungrabber, but he's right that the UN is dangerous. Schumer was talking about the building, not the organization, being a danger. The UN needs to die, now!!!
39
posted on
08/29/2006 8:49:46 PM PDT
by
JBGUSA
(If it's us or them, I choose us.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson