Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marsh_of_mists
No, it wasn't. If the paleos had it their way, the Soviet Union would still be standing. Ronald Reagan ignored them and supported freedom movements around the periphery of the Soviet Empire and launched the missle defense project. Stability is NOT a good thing. Change is better when it gets rid of the conditions that allow evil to endure.

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo! )

4 posted on 08/26/2006 1:21:03 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
Stability is NOT a good thing. Change is better when it gets rid of the conditions that allow evil to endure.

If I was to pick the one thing that separates conservatives from neoconservatives it would be the doctrine of preemption. Conservatives, and Paleos for that matter, are both "realists" in foreign policy. i.e. you can do just about anything in your own backyard...just don't do it in my yard.

The doctrine of preemption on the other hand, is very forward thinking and aggressive. And in the era of muslim fanaticism coupled with the proliferation WMDs... give us no other choice, the UN not withstanding... They're a joke.

6 posted on 08/26/2006 2:18:25 PM PDT by Donald Rumsfeld Fan ("Fake but Accurate": NY Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson