[thoughtomator]

Yeah I bet he was "painting" the young males he brought to his apartment.

[dubie]

The question is what was he painting them with...

Day laborer?

[Arthalion]

Yeah I bet he was "painting" the young males he brought to his apartment.

To be fair, that may have been all it was. I painted both male and female nudes in art class back in college, and there was nothing erotic about it. The human form, with all of its varying lines and curves, is fairly difficult to paint realistically and accurately. Many painters spend years mastering the art of drawing the human form.

There's even a very valid reason why he might have chosen day laborers...they work cheap, and they tend to be in physically good shape (hard work eliminates the flab that many Americans have, and accentuates the lines of the muscles).

He might have been a gay guy just looking for a roll in the hay, but I'm not willing to hang that on him based only on this article.

[ichabod1]

Blasting them in the face like a Jackson Pollack?