One of the people with whom I often work made an 1800% ROI on a company producing solar panels. You can make a lot of green with green.
Actually they are Euros, so it is a more colorful pallette of bills. But, the 100 is still green.
They "often made an 1800% ROI"--and people aren't flooding into solar panel production? What the heck is this company? Enron?
One of the people with whom I often work made an 1800% ROI on a company producing solar panels. You can make a lot of green with green.
I can also make a lot of money at the race track or with a lottery ticket. Don't confuse luck with good decision making.
You’re wrong about this: It is not contradictory to conservative ideology to state that the earth is a finite planet with limited resources.
Conservatives know that there is no such thing as a ‘natural resource’ and that free marketplaces and human minds will solve problems. That’s our route.
Have you read Julian Simon’s writings?
http://archive.wired.com/wired/archive/5.02/ffsimon_pr.html
Are you aware of the disastrous results of mega-projects nearly without exception?
http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2015/05/bent_flyvbjerg.html
More importantly is that the estimated potential rise in temperature spans a broad range. For the vast majority of that range ‘global warming’ doesn’t cause catastrophic harm. What’s the problem?