[Froufrou]

I heard him on Hannity, too, and I think he's exceptionally adult in his perspectives. If he's terminal - and we all are - he should live as he chooses so long as he causes no harm to others and breaks no laws. The exception would have been had he illegally refused chemo.

[RushCrush]

How does one illegally refuse chemo as opposed to what this kid is doing?

[JamesP81]

The exception would have been had he illegally refused chemo.

And how exactly would it ever be illegal to refuse chemo?

[Zon]

The exception would have been had he illegally refused chemo.

A government that can prohibit certain drugs or therapy can force persons to ingest certain drugs or therapy. Happens quite often with the WOD and Ritalin.

Every person breaks the law several times a year, Yet, with all that lawlessness society has not plunged into self-destruction. It didn't last year, a decade ago, fifty years nor a century ago. At the rate of 3,000 new laws and regulations created at the federal level each year how is it that persons and society don't run headlong into destruction without the new laws to come next year and each year thereafter -- yet in reality persons and society increasingly prosper despite not having the supposed benefits of future laws and despite massive lawlessness?

Politicians and bureaucrats are parasitical elites. They feed/leech off the working man and working woman. Without the workers of the world, value producers, the parasitical elites would perish because they are net value destroyers.