Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British police seek new detention orders
AP via Yahoo! ^ | Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:28 AM ET | MATT MOORE

Posted on 08/16/2006 4:42:37 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy

LONDON - British investigators plan to tell a judge in a closed-door hearing Wednesday why 22 people arrested in a foiled plot to blow up as many as 10 trans-Atlantic jetliners should be kept in custody without charge.

Police, meanwhile, examined several homes and businesses for clues into the alleged plot broken up last week.

British officials have said little about the plot since they announced Thursday that they had disrupted a major attack. Investigators will have to provide at least some details of their evidence to the judge at the hearing Wednesday afternoon

Air service nudged closer to normal on Tuesday, with British Airways reporting that it planned to operate 90 percent of scheduled services from Heathrow airport on Wednesday and resume a full schedule on Friday.

London's Metropolitan Police said another person had been arrested in the Thames Valley area west of London, but gave no further details. They also disclosed raids on a pair of Internet cafes, and investigators meticulously went over a stretch of woods where a news report said they discovered a handgun and rifle.

There was new concern about security after a 12-year-old boy managed to board a plane at Gatwick Airport on Tuesday without a passport, ticket or boarding pass. He was detected by cabin crew and removed before the flight took off.

"The boy had passed through a full security screening process and we are confident there was no threat to passengers, staff or the aircraft at any time," said Stewart McDonald, spokesman the airport's owner, BAA PLC.

Tough new anti-terror laws give the government up to 28 days to hold suspects without charge, but they must periodically go before a judge to make a case for continued confinement. The accused person is represented by lawyers and does not appear in court.

Twenty-four people were originally arrested in connection with the terror plot. Twenty-two of them had their detentions extended Friday night through Wednesday. One person had his detention extended on Monday, and one person was released without charge last week.

Britain doubled the maximum time for police to interrogate suspects after the July 7, 2005, bombings, which killed 52 people and four suicide bombers on London's transit network.

Amjad Sarwar said his brother, Assad, was one of the people arrested but that he was not involved in terrorism.

"They've got it all wrong," Sarwar told Britain's Channel 4. "He is an innocent guy. He minds his own business — he's been helping the youth out considerably in the area, and he's got nothing to do with it.

"There is no way he could have anything to do with terrorism. He condemns terrorism."

Two Internet cafes were raided in central Slough, 25 miles west of London, not far from the High Wycombe neighborhood where several suspects were arrested.

A Metropolitan Police spokeswoman said that 46 locations, including businesses and homes, have been searched, with 22 of those still being investigated.

Officers have not disclosed details about any items recovered during the searches, despite reports that firearms had been found.

The British Broadcasting Corp. reported that a search of the woodland area in High Wycombe turned up several firearms and other items of interest. It was not clear if they were to be used in the alleged jetliner plot, which authorities say involved a plan to smuggle liquid explosives hidden in hand luggage aboard flights.

Halfway around the world, investigations continued in Pakistan, where authorities held 17 people, including British citizen Rashid Rauf, who they said has al-Qaida connections and was a key player in the plot. At least one of Rauf's brothers was arrested in England during the sweep here.

Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said the country may extradite Rauf to Britain but that request had not yet been made.

The investigation was colored by claims that Britain's government has talked tough regarding terrorism but has been slow to act.

Conservative Party leader David Cameron said Prime Minister Tony Blair failed to follow through on a plan unveiled after last year's London transit bombings to crack down on radical clerics and help Britain's moderate Muslims face down militants in their communities.

"We need follow-through when the headlines have moved on," Cameron said. "But precious little has actually been done."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: crushislam; islam; islamicnazis; islamisevil; islamofascism; londonairlineplot; muslim; muslims; terrorism; trop; war; waronterror; wot
"Tough new anti-terror laws give the government up to 28 days to hold suspects without charge, but they must periodically go before a judge to make a case for continued confinement."
1 posted on 08/16/2006 4:42:38 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy

Related Reuters story - http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060816/ts_nm/security_britain_arrest_dc


2 posted on 08/16/2006 4:44:25 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Blog entry discussing some of the differences between US & Brit legal system - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1684571/posts


3 posted on 08/16/2006 5:08:53 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
The boy had passed through a full security screening process and we are confident there was no threat to passengers, staff or the aircraft at any time

Warning, Will Rogers, warning! If a 12 year old can get past "a full security screening process".... move along, nothing to see.

4 posted on 08/16/2006 5:14:34 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Rogers?


5 posted on 08/16/2006 5:15:42 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
The government proposed a 90 day detonation for situations like this. The investigation is international and complex.

It was voted down and 28 days was agreed.

If this goes to the wire there will be some embarressed faces in the Conservative and liberal parties (and some Labour MP's who voted helped vote it down).
6 posted on 08/16/2006 5:18:41 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vimto

vimto, thanks for the background. I got the impression that they can keep applying for extensions - can you fill us in on the details of the UK law in this regard?


7 posted on 08/16/2006 6:26:40 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
I'm no expert on criminal law. But as far as I am aware the arrest warrant can be claimed for 28 days with judicial oversight, after which they have to be charged with an of fence or let them go. They could be rearrested (it does happen now and then) but how likely that is I don't know. I am willing to be corrected by another Freeper. But in this case I think I've got the essence of it all.

As I say - if this goes to the wire there will be some red faces - this was voted on about 3 months ago. The civil liberties group were up in arms finding strange bedfellows with the Conservative Party. The request for the 90 days detention came directly from the police, not a political party though Blair supported it and took a big political knock in doing so, by the time it got to parliament it looked like a dead duck..
8 posted on 08/16/2006 6:43:24 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vimto
Thank you, vimto. I may have misunderstood the article, it appears that the extension they are applying for is to extend to 28 days (from the normal 14). That apparently takes judicial approval, not necessarily a bad thing.

I would guess that in this case they have enough to charge most if not all of the detainees w/in the 28 days.

Links for the Office of Public Sector Information I've found:

Terrorism Act 2006

Explanatory Notes to Terrorism Act 2006

Extension of period of detention of terrorist suspects

9 posted on 08/16/2006 6:58:32 AM PDT by Ready4Freddy (Hey, look man, I didn't mean to shoot the son of a b!tch. The gun went off. I don't know why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
we are expecting the judgment on the 13 arrested anytime now.

The extension to 14 days is given by a district judge.

They have to return to the High Court if they want the full 28 day allocation.

We shall see.
10 posted on 08/16/2006 10:21:58 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson