Posted on 08/15/2006 3:32:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - The government sought to assure airline travelers Tuesday that X-raying shoes at security checkpoints was a reliable way of detecting improvised bombs, a claim contradicted by a Department of Homeland Security study.
"Screening shoes by X-ray is an effective way of identifying any anomaly, including explosives," said Kip Hawley, Transportation Security Administration chief, at a news conference at Reagan National Airport just outside Washington.
A study by the Homeland Security Department, obtained by The Associated Press, states that X-ray images "do not provide the information necessary to effect detection of explosives."
Under new orders this week, all airline passengers must put their shoes through X-ray machines before boarding their flights.
A scientist who has studied the issue said the truth lies somewhere between the study's findings that X-ray machines can't detect bombs and Hawley's assertion that they can.
Richard Lanza, senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said the X-ray image doesn't identify what a gel or a liquid is made of. But, Lanza said, screeners can "look at the image and connect regions that look the same in density and shape."
It's not a foolproof method, but it is often effective, he said.
"Nothing is 100 percent," Lanza said. "But if the bad guys think you have a good shot at discovering it, they'll do something different."
Hawley said that 31,000 screeners have been specially trained to see if a shoe has been tampered with when they look at its X-ray image.
"It does take the human brain to make the interpretation on X-ray, but it is, frankly, not the most difficult thing we have to do to find potential shoe bombs," Hawley said.
He displayed copies of X-ray images of two pairs of shoes — one with no explosive device and one worn by Richard Reid, who was arrested aboard a trans-Atlantic flight in 2001 when he tried to ignite a bomb in his shoe.
"You can see very clearly the difference between a shoe with an explosive and one without," Hawley said.
But the Homeland Security Department said in its April 2005 report that the ability of screeners to detect improvised explosive devices "is not a matter of proper training, reinforcement or motivation." The report is titled "Systems Engineering Study of Civil Aviation Security — Phase I."
The report cited studies that show a person who has made or carried a bomb is likely to have traces of explosives residue on his hand. The report recommended that screeners use a technology called explosives trace detection, or ETD, on the shoes and hands of passengers who arouse suspicion or are randomly chosen for more screening.
ETD is commonly used at airports by TSA screeners, who use a dry pad on the end of a wand to wipe a surface — baggage, shoes, clothing. They then put the pad into an ion mobility spectrometer that can detect traces of explosives.
The TSA's new screening procedures were ordered after British police last week broke up a terrorist plot to assemble and detonate bombs aboard as many as 10 trans-Atlantic flights from Britain.
Airline passengers can no longer carry liquids and gels into airline passenger cabins. Their carry-on luggage is searched by hand more, and they're subject to random double screening at boarding gates.
On Sunday, the TSA made it mandatory for shoes to be run through X-ray machines as passengers go through metal detectors. The checks were begun in late 2001, after Reid's arrest, and have been optional for several years.
___
On the Net:
Transportation Security Administration: http://www.tsa.gov
My shoes set off the metal detector so I always take them off.
Well, they can detect pipe bombs anyway.
Well they can’t detect explosives but then can detect an alteration in the shoe. That is what the screeners are looking for.
I posted something similar a couple of days ago critical of the DHLS (AND GOD FORBID, FROM THE APROPROPRIATED PRESS-AP) and was thoroughly sh*t on by many for having the temerity (as a newbie no less, although that ain't exactly true) to post anything that was critical of DHLS or W. and came from the AP
Guess we'll see if the nut cakes come out in mass and attack you like they did me?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.