Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tough Lessons For Israeli Armour
BBC ^ | 8/15/06 | Jonathan Marcus

Posted on 08/15/2006 12:59:18 PM PDT by BunnySlippers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: doc30

Exactly right.

Elect a Clinton, get a Clinton.

The worst thing you can do in a fight is to hit a guy, and then just stand there.


61 posted on 08/15/2006 11:17:12 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Soros is a communist goon, controlled by communist goons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Do you think that the tank casualties played any part in giving in to a ceasefire that was IMO premature?

I think it gave those in the Israeli government that were looking for an excuse to not go after Hezbollah aggressively ammunition to use in their arguments, just like our soldiers dying to IEDs in Iraq gives those demanding we cut in run in Iraq ammunition.

However, I think that in the absence of those casualties, they would have just concentrated on other reasons.

While it is a tragedy the IDF members have had to give their lives defending their country, the losses were not strategically significant.

Such losses can be used to justify modifying the rules of engagement to show less concern for destroying Lebanese buildings, and risking higher civilian casualties by pounding the areas harder from the air and with artillery. However, if you accept the fact that Israel must take steps to defend itself, and that negotiating from a position of weakness has never worked in the past, then the issue of the tank casualties simply changes the discussion on the rules of engagement. It doesn't justify pulling out.

Therefore I'm left questioning the Israeli government's will to do what must be done to defend their country, and I'm sure Hezbollah is questioning it as well.

Right now Israel has put it's hopes on the UN peacekeeping force's will to step in, disarm Hezbollah, and keep the peace.

Without the threat of Israel being willing to do what is necessary to take out Hezbollah, I don't think Hezbollah is going to give up their weapons and quit attacking Israel, and I don't think the Lebanese military and UN will make them do so.

Israel, the Lebanese government, and the UN have all shown an unwillingness to follow through in disarming Hezbollah.

Until at least one of those groups demonstrates that willingness, Hezbollah isn't going to change or go away.

62 posted on 08/16/2006 8:20:02 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson