Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NORTHCOM Was on Guard Against Plot to Bomb Planes, General Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | Steven Donald Smith

Posted on 08/11/2006 7:06:10 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Aug. 11, 2006 – U.S. Northern Command was aware of the terrorist plot to bomb commercial airplanes that came to light this week, and was prepared to act if necessary, the command’s operations director said yesterday. “We were working with other agencies and the Department of Homeland Security well in advance,” Army Maj. Gen. William Webster told a CNN reporter. “Our job is to deter, prevent and defeat threats to North America. It probably wouldn't be helpful to talk about how long but we’ve been working on this, but we’ve been working on this a long time.”

The Colorado Springs, Colo.-based command had also been coordinating with international intelligence agencies prior to yesterday’s arrest by British authorities of more than 20 terrorists suspected of plotting to bomb U.S.-bound commercial airplanes using liquid explosives.

“We work closely with our allies and federal agencies on a daily basis to keep track of threats we know about, those that are evolving, and those that are heavy against us so we can take the right actions and prevent them,” Webster said.

NORTHCOM was established in October 2002 to provide command and control for the Defense Department’s homeland defense efforts and to coordinate military assistance to civil authorities.

If an aircraft becomes a threat to North American infrastructure or civilians, NORTHCOM will direct fighter planes to either try to get the aircraft down on the ground safely, or, if ordered by the president, shoot it down.

“Part of our command is NORAD. Our fighters are on guard all the time,” the general said. “Our job 24/7 is to watch the skies and make sure those kinds threats are not to be carried through. We had fighters ready to take off (during the plot investigation), but we’re fortunate we didn’t have to do that.”

The North American Aerospace Defense Command is a bi-national U.S. and Canadian organization charged with the missions of aerospace warning and aerospace control for North America.

NORAD and NORTHCOM remain vigilant to potential terrorist threats and are prepared to respond to threats in all domains, whether on land, in the air or at sea, NORAD officials said.

In related news, following the lead of several other states, including New York and Massachusetts, New Mexico put its National Guard on alert and beefed up security at the Albuquerque International Sunport airport in the wake of the terrorist plot.

Because of the recent threat, the U.S. raised the nation’s threat level for commercial flights originating in the United Kingdom and bound for the United States to its highest alert level of Severe, or Red. The threat level for all other flights was raised to High, or Orange.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson said his office was in contact with Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration.

“We will continue to closely monitor the situation, and we stand ready to provide whatever assistance necessary to support DHS and the TSA and to ensure the safety of all New Mexicans, especially those traveling by air,” Richardson said in a news release.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bomb; guard; northcom; planes; plot; wot

1 posted on 08/11/2006 7:06:11 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...

I just post 'em.....


2 posted on 08/11/2006 7:06:35 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
I believe him. We just didn't, happen, on this. What bothers me is that they feel the need to share this with us. That really bothers me. It's out of character.
3 posted on 08/11/2006 7:09:26 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Their plan was probably to shoot down everything down.


4 posted on 08/11/2006 7:19:30 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

It's the only post I've seen to let me know they were involved, so I'm glad to see it. I don't think it gave any information out by doing so, much less info than I got about the British surveillance, so I'm glad.


5 posted on 08/11/2006 7:25:04 PM PDT by gentlestrength
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise; SandRat

> Their plan was probably to shoot down everything down.

Doubtful. This is not a 9/11 scenario. The bombers didn't
plan to hijack the planes, just blow them up when over a
populated area.

Any suspect plane would be ordered to land at a remote
field, or at one with a pure overwater final approach.
If the perps are gonna take it down anyway, there's no
need to shoot it down in that situation.

An Air Egypt "freighter" that is unresponsive to ATC
instructions, on the other hand, is an entirely
different matter.


6 posted on 08/11/2006 7:28:52 PM PDT by Boundless (Imagine if Fox had a news channel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

What good could they have done, if the plan was to blow them up over the Atlantic?


7 posted on 08/11/2006 7:39:55 PM PDT by PghBaldy (CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boundless
In terms of potential lives lost, I think this would have been comparable to 9/11. The loss of 10 to 12 planes, plus a possible initial loss of ground victims, could have been 3 to 5 thousand people. However in terms of actual targets, the comparison would stop.

I have thought of various scenarios on how it would have played out, and I neglected the commonality of origin of the planes. Assuming that someone realized that the planes blowing up were from the same airport, then any planes from that airport would be diverted, instead of the ATCs having to guess which ones of the hundreds were in danger.

8 posted on 08/11/2006 7:48:23 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; PghBaldy
SandRat thanks for [posting this. Glad to know they have been on it for a while.

PghBaldy I have heard the same reports that the plan was to blow them up over the ocean. I would think otherwise though. These lunatics seam to want to maximize causalities so why would they not wait till they were over American soil. I wonder if that really was the plan but not reported as such to keep people from panicking.
9 posted on 08/11/2006 8:07:13 PM PDT by angelsonmyside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
What good could they have done, if the plan was to blow them up over the Atlantic?

From some of the reports I have heard, the plan was to blow them up over a populated area if possible. That would certainly make sense. I assume that the fighters would now have shoot-down orders also, something lacking pre-9/11, otherwise I couldn't see the point in launching a fighter when just a Cessna would do; fuel is expensive.
10 posted on 08/11/2006 8:21:31 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: jiminwimberley
and planes are used as missiles once again

Yup. Either you gain control or the plane of you bring it down...and in either case the terrorist wins. Bojinka also proved that you did not need a big bomb, only a well-placed one...as was later proven in Russia.
12 posted on 08/11/2006 8:39:20 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

It is all coming out, little by little. Good thing the Times didn't know all of this, and I am actually surprised they didn't.


13 posted on 08/11/2006 8:40:28 PM PDT by ladyinred (Thank God the Brits don't have a New York Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angelsonmyside; P-40

OK, that makes sense. One thing I thought - part of the power of the 9/11 attacks was the fact they were shown on TV, live. It would make sense for the jihadis to blow up planes over land for just that purpose (or just the fact that many would see it with their own eyes, or cameraphones).


14 posted on 08/12/2006 11:48:15 AM PDT by PghBaldy (CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson