Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Democrats say plot shows Iraq war a diversion
Reuters ^ | 10 Aug 2006 | John Whitesides

Posted on 08/10/2006 6:54:04 PM PDT by seastay

Prominent Democrats said on Thursday a foiled plot in Britain to blow up U.S.-bound planes showed the Bush administration's pursuit of war in Iraq had diverted resources from the bigger threat of terrorism and made the danger worse.

With national security likely to play a crucial role in November's elections, some Democrats attacked President George W. Bush's justifications for the Iraq war and said the plot showed the terrorism threat was growing under his watch.

"Five years after 9-11, it is clear that our misguided policies are making America more hated in the world and making the war on terrorism harder to win," Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts said.

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said Bush and Congress needed to change course in Iraq and ensure Americans are protected around the world.

"The Iraq war has diverted our focus and more than $300 billion in resources from the war on terrorism and has created a rallying cry for international terrorists," Reid said.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman responded that "instead of focusing on political attacks," Democrats should be reminded the country is at war and needs every tool to win.

"If Harry Reid had his way and killed the Patriot Act and ended the Terrorist Surveillance Program, authorities would be less able to uncover terror plots," he said.

The U.S. government heightened security on passenger planes and barred air travelers from carrying liquids on Thursday after Britain foiled the plot aimed at blowing up planes flying to the United States.

Bush, who launched a global war on terrorism after the Sept. 11 attacks, said the plot was "a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation."

IRAQ FOCUS QUESTIONED

But Bush's foe in the 2004 election, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, said America was "not as safe as we can and must be" and in part blamed the president's focus on Iraq.

"This event exposes the misleading myth that we are fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here. In fact, the war in Iraq has become a dangerous distraction and a profound drain on our financial and military resources," Kerry said.

National security and the Iraq war are likely to play prominent roles in congressional elections in November, when control of Congress will be up for grabs.

Despite Bush's low poll ratings, the handling of national security and the war on terrorism has remained one area where Bush and Republicans are preferred by voters in some opinion polls and Republicans effectively used the issue in 2002 and 2004.

Republicans led by Vice President Dick Cheney attacked Democrats as soft on national security on Wednesday, the day after Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman lost a Democratic primary to anti-war challenger Ned Lamont over the senator's support of the war.

Lamont issued a statement on Thursday saying national security and the ability to fight terrorism had been weakened under Bush and "both anger at America around the world and the number of terrorists seeking to do us harm have increased."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gwot; londonairlineplot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2006 6:54:04 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seastay

What?


2 posted on 08/10/2006 6:55:34 PM PDT by b4its2late (Liberals are as confused as a hungry baby in a topless bar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
How can anything that kills terrorists be a diversion from the War on Terror?
3 posted on 08/10/2006 6:56:37 PM PDT by msnimje ("Beware the F/A - 22 Raptor with open doors" -- Unknown US NAVY Raptor Pilot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

The Democrats have a plan.

Pretend threats don't exist, and any that pop up, just sprinkle them with fairy dust.


4 posted on 08/10/2006 6:56:48 PM PDT by KJC1 ("Thank you for the Hezbollah view." (Tony Snow to Helen Thomas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

Democrats are idiots, bump.


5 posted on 08/10/2006 6:57:02 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Join FR Team 36120 at http://folding.stanford.edu {Protein Folding Project})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
What a bunch of maroons.

They just gotta deflect Bush's successes of protecting the American public, by somehow harping on the Iraq war as a red herring....

6 posted on 08/10/2006 6:57:09 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

In a similar vein - if our attention is diverted, how is it we were able to stop this before it happened?


7 posted on 08/10/2006 6:57:51 PM PDT by linear (Zealotry paints in black and white; evil sees only gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: seastay

These pieces of dirt need to shut up once and for all and do their freaking jobs. Represent this nation, not the enemies.


8 posted on 08/10/2006 6:58:41 PM PDT by ladyinred (Thank God the Brits don't have a New York Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

Captured terrorists should be offered a ride in Teddy's car across Dyke Bridge after the senator's had a few. That should scare them sufficiently to end this thing altogether.


9 posted on 08/10/2006 6:58:43 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

You would really have to burry your intelligence to buy this load of crap.


10 posted on 08/10/2006 6:59:04 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

The Liberal line is, the war in Iraq has nothing to do with the WOT. They're separate issues. Heard a dem on TV say just that today.


11 posted on 08/10/2006 6:59:27 PM PDT by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linear
"...if our attention is diverted, how is it we were able to stop this before it happened?"

"I find your lack of faith disturbing."
12 posted on 08/10/2006 7:00:02 PM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: seastay

The Democrats have lost all touch with reality. This is more proof that doing recreational drugs isn't good for you.


13 posted on 08/10/2006 7:00:47 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (I support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

This is the press release equivalent of shutting one's eyes, sticking one's fingers in one's ears and saying "MEMEMEMEMEMEME" loudly to drown out any ambient noise.


14 posted on 08/10/2006 7:00:48 PM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline has been Reutered. (Can you tell?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
The Democrats are nauseating in their NEED to spin any threat to this country in a way they believe will benefit their political party.

I have resisted, many times, the urge to call them traitors, but how can I do so when the evidence is staring me in the face?

The Democrats value their gaining political power over their country's well-being--how is that anything but treasonous?

Fortunately, this type of thing, however it is spun, will guarantee that just enough voters think them lunatics so they remain out of power.

15 posted on 08/10/2006 7:01:05 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message/2006_04.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Wow, talk about a misleading headline! Jeez! Or maybe that should be "Jazeera!"

Mark

16 posted on 08/10/2006 7:01:24 PM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linear

"if our attention is diverted, how is it we were able to stop this before it happened?"

Exactly.


17 posted on 08/10/2006 7:02:00 PM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: seastay

Their plan is to tax the rich and grant reparations to downtrodden minorities. (Sarcasm)


18 posted on 08/10/2006 7:02:09 PM PDT by Panzerlied ("We shall never surrender!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

A terrorist plot thwarted and dems blame Bush and Republicans for not doing enough. What else is new?


19 posted on 08/10/2006 7:02:59 PM PDT by Barte45 (Conservative Christian @ Heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

Only the Rats with the help of Reuters could come up with such an idiotic conclusion like this.


20 posted on 08/10/2006 7:03:07 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson