Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
"And that flaw is that it does not agree with your a priori religion belief."

It has nothing to do with religion. I just recognize that most of science is junk science, and history has proven this time and time again. Evolution has lots of flaws. Just admit it and I am fine with it. I would say the reason science does not want to admit that is because they are anti-religious. Let's just be honest.
19 posted on 08/03/2006 10:02:55 AM PDT by Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Hendrix
Let's just be honest.

Careful, don't do anything you might later regret

28 posted on 08/03/2006 10:10:22 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Science is about unanswered questions. Religion is about unquestioned answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Hendrix
Evolution has lots of flaws. Just admit it and I am fine with it. I would say the reason science does not want to admit that is because they are anti-religious. Let's just be honest.

The reason you want to find flaws in evolution appears that you are religious; why are you trying to take all of science down with evolution?

Do you really think trashing all of science for personal religious reasons is either productive, or a good idea? (Be careful what you wish for... )

34 posted on 08/03/2006 10:14:25 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Hendrix
I just recognize that most of science is junk science, and history has proven this time and time again.

...he said, posting on the internet through his computer...

43 posted on 08/03/2006 10:23:15 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Hendrix
I just recognize that most of science is junk science, and history has proven this time and time again.

...then you won't have any trouble supporting your claim, right? Hint: Cherry-picking a few examples won't do a damned thing to help your claim, unless you can demonstrate that those few examples constitute "most of science".

We await your stunningly convincing proof of your biased claim.

Evolution has lots of flaws.

And what would those be?

Just admit it and I am fine with it.

It isn't complete, no field of science is (nor is any other variety of human knowledge). But I strongly suspect that the nature of its incompleteness is vastly different from your wild guesses about its alleged "flaws".

I would say the reason science does not want to admit that is because they are anti-religious.

I would say the reason you say this is because you read too many creationist tracts and too few science journals.

Let's just be honest.

Yes, let's do -- will you be honest enough to document your wild accusations, or will you be honest enough to retract them if you can't? Evolution has lots of flaws. Just admit it and I am fine with it. I would say the reason science does not want to admit that is because they are anti-religious. Let's just be honest.

78 posted on 08/03/2006 10:51:31 AM PDT by Ichneumon (Ignorance is curable, but the afflicted has to want to be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson