[Hendrix]

"Intelligent design isn't science."

And science does not have the answers or the ability to find the answers to most things, so science has very little credibility at finding answers. The fact that something is not science does not bother me because most of science is junk anyway and it is full of politics and dishonesty. Science is like the old media--it is losing its credibility to be objective.

[Coyoteman]

And science does not have the answers or the ability to find the answers to most things, so science has very little credibility at finding answers.

So, how do you heat your cave?

[Virginia-American]

And science does not have the answers or the ability to find the answers to most things, so science has very little credibility at finding answers.

But within its limited realm, it is very very good at finding answers. Remember recently the ToE was used to predict what to look for and where to look, and now we have yet another transitional fossil, Tiktaalik. That's more in one year thn ID or creationism has done in 200 (or 5000).

The fact that something is not science does not bother me because most of science is junk anyway and it is full of politics and dishonesty. Science is like the old media--it is losing its credibility to be objective.

An interesting scientific experiment would be to measure the pH of your grapes.

[LibertarianSchmoe]

And science does not have the answers or the ability to find the answers to most things, so science has very little credibility at finding answers.
...most of science is junk anyway and it is full of politics and dishonesty. Science is like the old media--it is losing its credibility to be objective.

Would you say that you are anti-science?

[Ichneumon]

And science does not have the answers or the ability to find the answers to most things,

"Most" things? Support your claim, and document your sources.

so science has very little credibility at finding answers.

Translation: Hendrix is anti-science and feels free to ignore and findings that he doesn't want to think about.

The fact that something is not science does not bother me because most of science is junk anyway and it is full of politics and dishonesty.

"Most" science is junk? Again, feel free to support your silly claim, if you think you can. To begin, go ahead and convince us that you have any familiarity whatsoever with "most" of science.

Science is like the old media--it is losing its credibility to be objective.

And anti-science bias is like liberalism...

[MineralMan]

"most of science is junk anyway and it is full of politics and dishonesty."

That's right, darn it. Your computer doesn't work. When you get pneumonia, neither do antibiotics. Television doesn't work.

Worse, jet planes can't fly, and we have no idea what causes babies. /sarc