Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution issue tips board’s balance [Kansas school board election]
Lawrence Journal-World (Kansas) ^ | 02 August 2006 | Sophia Maines

Posted on 08/02/2006 3:46:10 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

Darwin won.

Moderate Kansas State Board of Education candidates pulled off a victory Tuesday, gathering enough might to topple the board’s 6-4 conservative majority.

A victory by incumbent Janet Waugh, a Democrat whose district includes parts of Lawrence, and wins by Republican moderates in two districts previously represented by conservatives left the tables turned heading into the Nov. 7 general election.

“If we change the board around, we’ll be able to make decisions that we think are right for our students,” Lawrence school board member Craig Grant said.

Grant had worked to defeat the conservatives who attracted international attention and ridicule for the state after adopting science standards critical of evolution.

Waugh held onto her seat in District 1, rebuffing a challenge from conservative Jesse Hall who, according to the last campaign finance report, had raised about three times more money. But Waugh collected 63 percent of the vote.

“Obviously money can’t buy elections,” she said. “I think the people of Kansas are tired of being the laughingstock not only of the nation but the world.”

Not all the conservatives were defeated.

Conservative incumbent John Bacon held his seat in District 3, which includes parts of Johnson County. Bacon won by a slim margin, with 49 percent. Challengers Harry McDonald, Olathe, the former president of Kansas Citizens for Science, and David Oliphant, also of Olathe, split the remaining vote.

Bacon faces Democrat Don Weiss in the general election.

In the District 5 race to represent a large part of western Kansas, conservative incumbent Connie Morris trailed moderate challenger Sally Cauble who at midnight had 54 percent of the vote with 556 of 609 precincts reporting.

Conservative Ken Willard held his seat in District 7 by a wide margin. He faces Democrat Jack Wempe in November.

And with few votes still to be counted at midnight, moderate Jana Shaver appeared to be the favorite for the District 9 seat. Shaver ran against Brad Patzer, son-in-law of outgoing conservative board member Iris Van Meter. At press time, Shaver had 58 percent of the vote. The winner faces Democrat Kent Runyan in the general election.The five races have attracted national attention as both sides battled for control of the board.Many wanted a shake-up after the 6-4 conservative majority altered the state’s science standards, rewriting the definition of science and adding criticism of evolution.

Proponents of Kansas’ latest standards say they encourage open discussion.

“Students need to have an accurate assessment of the state of the facts in regard to Darwin’s theory,” said John West, a vice president for the Center for Science and Culture at the Seattle-based, anti-evolution Discovery Institute.

The conservative board majority changed the rules on sex education, requiring parental permission before students participate in classes, though districts including Lawrence opted not to change their ways.

And the conservative majority pressed the issue further, considering an “abstinence-until-marriage” approach to sex education.

It also filled the state’s top education administrative seat with Bob Corkins — a conservative activist with no educational background who lobbied against increased school funding.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: bewareofluddites; braying; crevolist; darwinismyidol; darwinlost; enoughalready; evojunk; evosarenotnice; fruitfliesproveit; frustratedcriders; fsmlovesyou; idiocydefeated; idjunkscience; kansasrejectsidiocy; noonesevernice; ntsa; onetrickpony; pavlovian; poorwiddleluddites; schoolboard; superstitiouskooks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last
Everybody be nice.
1 posted on 08/02/2006 3:46:12 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Evolution Ping

The List-O-Links
A conservative, pro-evolution science list, now with over 380 names.
See the list's explanation, then FReepmail to be added or dropped.
To assist beginners: But it's "just a theory", Evo-Troll's Toolkit,
and How to argue against a scientific theory.

2 posted on 08/02/2006 3:47:38 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Copy of what I posted at the end of yesterday's thread:

Creationists in the election:

Dist. 1: Jesse Hall loses 37% to 63%, all the votes counted
Dist. 3: John Bacon wins with 49% in a 3-way race, all votes counted
Dist. 5: Connie Morris loses with 46% to 54% for Sane Sally Cauble, 99% of votes counted
Dist. 7: Ken Willard wins with 54% in a 3-way race, all votes counted
Dist. 9: Brad Patzer loses with 42% to 58%, all votes counted
Continually updated election results from AP, at the site of the Kansas City Star (the five school board election results are at the very bottom, so you have to scroll down): Election results.

Three creationists lose, including the vivacious Connie Morris, the fantasy lassie of the prairie. Be still my heart!

3 posted on 08/02/2006 3:49:19 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
"“Students need to have an accurate assessment of the state of the facts in regard to Darwin’s theory,” said John West, a vice president for the Center for Science and Culture at the Seattle-based, anti-evolution Discovery Institute."

And maybe now they will.
4 posted on 08/02/2006 3:50:55 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
“Students need to have an accurate assessment of the state of the facts in regard to Darwin’s theory,” said John West, a vice president for the Center for Science and Culture at the Seattle-based, anti-evolution Discovery Institute.

The voters seem to agree on wanting an accurate assessment of the facts.

5 posted on 08/02/2006 3:51:11 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

You have to be careful what you ask for.


6 posted on 08/02/2006 3:51:45 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Yesterday, I expressed the hope that all the ding-a-lings would lose, as they did in Dover after Kitzmiller et al. v Dover Area School District et al., reported here: Dover boots board.

Well, I didn't get my wish, but this result -- in Kansas! -- is just fine. The Discovery Institute had pinned all their dwindling hopes on this election. I guess they figured that if they have a shot anywhere, it's in Kansas. Well, guess what?

Now, surely Republican party pros have received the message that creationism isn't a winner on election day. And if national politics remains free of this madness, Republican dominance is probably assured for a generation.

God bless Judge Jones and the voters of Kansas!

7 posted on 08/02/2006 4:00:42 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Only one of the five creationists got a clear majority. There's a possibility he was popular for other reasons.


8 posted on 08/02/2006 4:04:56 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I was afraid that McDonald and Oliphant would split the vote in the 3rd district and that turns out to be what happened. Still this should tip the board back to the moderates and sanity.

I should point out that this has all happened before. Conservatives took over the board and introduced creationism and then in the next election the moderates took it back. But just two years later the creationists came back and took control again. This battle isn't over. It'll continue in 2008 and 2010 and 2012...

9 posted on 08/02/2006 4:10:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
In Kansas, they're waking up to this kind of TV news: Evolution opponents lose control of Kansas Board of Education. Excerpt:
Conservative Republicans who brought international attention to Kansas by approving academic standards calling evolution into question lost control of the state school board in primaries.

As a result of the vote, board members and candidates who believe evolution is well-supported by evidence will have a 6-4 majority. Evolution skeptics had entered the election with a 6-4 majority.

[snip]

The most closely watched race was in western Kansas, where incumbent conservative Connie Morris lost her GOP primary to Sally Cauble. Both are former educators, but Morris had described evolution as ``an age-old fairy tale'' and ``a nice bedtime story'' unsupported by science.

Critics of Kansas' science standards worried that if conservatives retained the board's majority, it would lead to attempts in other states to copy the Kansas standards.

``There are people around the country who would like to see the Kansas standards in their own states,'' said Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for Science Education in Oakland, Calif., which supports the teaching of evolution.

[snip]


10 posted on 08/02/2006 4:18:30 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

It's a definite shift in allele frequency, due to natural selection.


11 posted on 08/02/2006 4:21:32 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Latest press release (dated 01 Aug) from the Discovery Institute. What an honorable bunch of folks!
Discovery Institute Statement on the Kansas Science Standards Situation.
12 posted on 08/02/2006 4:27:27 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
“The real debate is about academic freedom – the freedom of teachers to teach more about evolution, and the freedom of students to learn more about evolution”

I wonder if DI favors science teachers digging into a critical analysis of Genesis. Freedon to teach the controversy, after all.

13 posted on 08/02/2006 4:30:17 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I just read it -- are these people series?

It just leads to threads like the one yesterday where people ignorantly say "we just want to teach alternatives" where there ARE none.

*sigh*


14 posted on 08/02/2006 4:31:55 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (A Conservative will die for individual freedom. A Liberal will kill you for the good of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Losing candidate's statement: "I'm melting ... melting!!
15 posted on 08/02/2006 4:32:35 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (The Enlightenment gave us individual rights, free enterprise, and the theory of evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
“Will students have the academic freedom to learn about the Cambrian explosion 530 million years ago and the challenges it poses to Darwin’s theory?”

What's this about 530 million years?

16 posted on 08/02/2006 4:33:04 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Still hard at it, I see, vainly trying to close minds to free and open debate.

Bigoted Victorial-era Darwnists might manage close this flimsy door in its frame, but the barn walls are already falling all around it.

Face it, PH. Your side lost by having to turn to seedy politics and the thugs of the ACLU to protect "science" from scientific inquiry. History will record that you were disgraced.

17 posted on 08/02/2006 4:34:00 AM PDT by JCEccles (Darwinism: perfecting the human species one genocide at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Still hard at it, I see, vainly trying to close minds to free and open debate.

Bigoted Victorian-era Darwnists might manage close this flimsy door in its frame, but the barn walls are already falling all around it.

Face it, PH. Your side lost by having to turn to seedy politics and the thugs of the ACLU to protect "science" from scientific inquiry. History will record that you were disgraced.

18 posted on 08/02/2006 4:34:39 AM PDT by JCEccles (Darwinism: perfecting the human species one genocide at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Still hard at it, I see, vainly trying to close minds to free and open debate.

No one said they can't discuss alternatives. But in philosophy where it belongs.

Why do you constantly run this canard when it is patently false?

19 posted on 08/02/2006 4:40:08 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (A Conservative will die for individual freedom. A Liberal will kill you for the good of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
"Still hard at it, I see, vainly trying to close minds to free and open debate."

Yes, that is what you do best.

"Bigoted Victorian-era Darwnists might manage close this flimsy door in its frame, but the barn walls are already falling all around it."

Evolution is stronger now, and has wider scientific support than ever before. It is creationism/ID that has seen its house crumble. That is why creationists/ID'ers have abandoned science and are forced to go to the government for an affirmative action *diversity* handout for their theological beliefs.

"Your side lost by having to turn to seedy politics and the thugs of the ACLU to protect "science" from scientific inquiry."

Creationists/ID'ers are not engaged in scientific inquiry.
20 posted on 08/02/2006 4:41:17 AM PDT by CarolinaGuitarman (Gas up your tanks!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson