Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain Says (It) Faces Terrorist Threat
Yahoo! News (Reuters) ^ | 8/1/2006 | Gideon Long

Posted on 08/01/2006 6:42:49 AM PDT by Pyro7480

Britain says faces terrorist threat

By Gideon Long

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain launched a new security alert system on Tuesday, ranking the terrorist threat to the country as "severe" and saying an attack was highly likely.

It was the first time the government had published such information. Until now, it has argued that doing so would cause unnecessary alarm.

But faced with growing criticism that it was failing to spell out the threat from groups like al Qaeda, the government has decided to follow the lead of other countries and introduce a graded alert system.

It has five levels ranging from "low" (attack unlikely) to "critical" (attack expected imminently), and is similar to the one used in the United States for the past four years, although, unlike the U.S. model, it is not color-coded.

"Severe" is the second highest level.

The threat level was posted on a new Web site -- www.intelligence.gov.uk -- and on the Home Office (interior ministry) and security service sites.

Analysts say the decision to publish is part of a concerted effort -- not only by the government but also by the two security services MI5 and MI6 -- to be seen as more accountable.

"I don't think it'll have a massive impact on the public but I do think it might help government, the security services and the police have a clearer idea of where they all stand in their assessment of the threat faced," said Chris Pope, intelligence analyst at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).

"It might also mean the authorities are less likely to be criticized when things go wrong."

Until now, Britain operated a more complex 7-level system and never told the public what the level was.

The government was heavily criticized for having downgraded the threat level in May 2005, just two months before suicide bombers killed 52 people in London.

However, a parliamentary committee later concluded the downgrade had not meant Britain was any less able to deal with the bombings when they happened.

For decades, Britain's intelligence services have enjoyed -- many would say actively nurtured -- a reputation for extreme secrecy. Countless James Bond movies and spy novels have helped cement that reputation in the popular imagination.

But in recent years, both services have started to emerge from the shadows, launching their own Web sites and even advertising in national newspapers for new recruits.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blair; britain; islam; islamist; jihadineurope; muslim; terrorism; terrorist; threat; uk; waronterror
FYI
1 posted on 08/01/2006 6:42:51 AM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

All of which suggests that
that Britain's Home Office
is most certainly employing
"discovery" tactics re cell phone
and internet communications, for
which the Bush Administration
has been vilified by the ACLU
and the Liberal Left.


2 posted on 08/01/2006 6:53:06 AM PDT by Grendel9 (quen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Oh my, now they've done it! Surely this will only ANGER the jihadists, who feel so discriminated against, making them even more likely to attack. Better this threat should remain unvoiced. If ignored, it may just go away. More dialog is all that is needed and if we can just make them understand we mean them no harm, why surely they will stop hating us.

Why can't we all just get along?
3 posted on 08/01/2006 7:08:45 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Why can't we all just get along?

British people and Islam just aren't programmed to get along that's why, what sickens me in the UK is that rather than confront issues head on everyone in authority has gone soft and would rather roll over and surrender to this Islamic filth. If we tackle it here now while the muslim are 3% of pop we'll win but if we leave it till another 10 years time the muslim population would have grown significantly more which we'll really put us on the back foot!! The clock keeps ticking!!

4 posted on 08/01/2006 7:19:49 AM PDT by snowman_returns (Just enforced a politically correct free-zone around my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snowman_returns
Burka Britain eh?. The political leadership and the , the judiciary police are asleep at the wheel.
5 posted on 08/01/2006 7:30:58 AM PDT by vimto (Blighty Awaken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: snowman_returns
My post was meant to be sarcastic. I happen to agree with you 100% that the vermin should be rounded up, all of them, men, women and children and sent packing. They should then be allowed to reapply for entry into the country and on a case by case basis, after a thorough, exhausting and lengthy investigative process either accepted or declined. If it is a family that is applying and even one of them is unsatisfactory the entire family should be refused.

Once in country there is a zero tolerance in the case of any whiff of anti Christian, behavior. All Mosques are to be wired for sound and video and any other security measures deemed necessary put in place and maintained until these fuc*ing animals prove they are fit to live among humanity.
6 posted on 08/01/2006 7:52:08 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
But the BBC loves the haters.
The BBC needs to be removed from Britain as well.
7 posted on 08/01/2006 7:58:28 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: From One - Many

But they are so obvious in their bias that it hardly matters anymore. The only ones tuning in are those seeking validation of their political beliefs.


8 posted on 08/01/2006 8:05:58 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

you are correct, and a Britain without the BBC would be a much better Britain.


9 posted on 08/01/2006 8:11:41 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV

I believe without the BBC; Britain would be 'safer' as well.


10 posted on 08/01/2006 8:28:38 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson