Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
That is impressive. Is it correct to assume that the kill rate is limited by the length of the 'kill exposure' required for each type of target ? Sorry for making up the term 'kill exposure'. Don't know what they actually call it. So this baby is infrared also. Probably can cook a turkey in under a minute.
17 posted on 07/22/2006 6:00:29 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: justa-hairyape
Is it correct to assume that the kill rate is limited by the length of the 'kill exposure' required for each type of target ? Sorry for making up the term 'kill exposure'. Don't know what they actually call it.

That's okay. "Dwell time" is the nomenclature of choice in the biz. All are just verbal abbreviations to express this idea: Keep the beam on target sufficiently long for destruction. This dwell-time can vary based on target "hardness" or distance issues. Hence, the system has to be able to ascertain when the target either disintegrates or is sufficiently damaged as to permit transition to other targets. Thus in theory, as you surmise, rate-of-kill is limited by the length of that required dwell time. Most effective exposures have been extremely short in duration to have the destructive success, however.

20 posted on 07/22/2006 6:12:51 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson