[wagglebee]

The militant homosexual movement wants their degenerate lifestyle to be "normal" and they will do anything to try to establish it as such.

[wagglebee]

HA Ping.

[Steely Tom]

The militant homosexual movement wants their degenerate lifestyle to be "normal" and they will do anything to try to establish it as such.

Including the manufacture of evidence that the normal lifestyle is actually degenerate.

[rockrr]

I come from a family of five boys and none of us are homersexurals (although Lance does dress kinda funny...

[Tall_Texan]

van den Aardweg writes, "In short, all information on the relevant life-history data and developmental-psychological factors of these pivotal raised-apart boys is painfully missing. This unpardonable neglect makes any attempt at interpretation a mere groping in the dark."

Curious choice of words...

[gidget7]

ALL their studies are rubbish, as are many other so called scientific studies. Still they will be lauded as ground breaking, and quoted as statistics over and over and over. Any lie told often enough, they believe, becomes true.

And we Americans are stupid, silly little fools who will buy their propaganda, or so they think.

[Tax-chick]

Tell me again why we're supposed to respect "scientists"?

[DBeers]

Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search [ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

A study contending that boys with older brothers are biologically more likely to be homosexual has been challenged by a Canadian psychiatrist who dismisses the study as "rubbish," and by a Dutch psychologist who says the claims are "unsubstantiated."

Joseph Berger, a Distinguished Life Fellow with the American Psychiatric Association, and a member of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality's (NARTH) Scientific Advisory Committee, says in an article posted on NARTH's website that the study is "absolute utter rubbish" and "should never have been published."

YET -published it was AND touted in hundreds of headlines it was... Just like the recent "Lesbian Brain" study - ROTFLMAO

I do not envision that this version of the news will get as much fanfare -it never does...

[John Lenin]

[freespirited]

The author starts by presuming 'evidence' for some sort of biological causation of homosexuality.

I've read the study. I'd have to say that this criticism is groundless. If anythimg. it is these critics who start with a conclusion.

The study was not "rubbish" at all. It was done well.

You don't do a scientific study to prove what you want to believe. You do it to find out what the facts are, whether you like them or not.

[Intolerant in NJ]

...the only category that showed a possible determinant for homosexuality was the presence of older, biological brothers...mothers hoping for daughters have yet more sons, subtly overprotect and feminize these youngest sons to help fulfill their wishes, sons become "gay" - QED: family dynamics in cohorts of older/younger sons lead to homosexuality......

[CondiArmy]

I think that if I had been "reared" with my "older brother" I would have a good chance of being gay, also.

[dcnd9]

This is true and many innocents burdened with SSA are sold a lie by the schools, preachers and society who believe the militants position and have for 40 yrs..

I know a family with 3 relatives who are gay. All these men seem perfectly normal, have mega straight friends & work in the corporate world. You would never know unless told. They all were all told by religious men in high school and college to accept who they were etc., etc. They were never told to lead chaste lives or that they could overcome SSA and because of this indoctrination they don't believe they need to change their sexual preference. It's really sad what society has done to those afflicted with SSA.

Change is possible, and more importantly showing them 'how' to change, has been lost in the rhetoric.

[VOA]

Boegart based his findings on data from 5,000 interviews of men by
Alfred C. Kinsey, the now-discredited sex research pioneer.

Folks should see the PBS "American Experience" episode on Kinsey.
(and make sure the kiddies are already in bed!)

Funny how the professors at university never told me that Kinsey
(and his colleagues) were getting their pan-sexual jollies as part of
their funded research!
But good credit to PBS for actually airing this!