Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freepers Help! Another Eminent Domain Theft
Fox News Hannity and Colmes video 7/19 | 7/19/06 | gentlestrength

Posted on 07/19/2006 2:14:54 PM PDT by gentlestrength

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: gentlestrength

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1394950/posts
Political Party Fundraiser David D'Amiano Sentenced to Two Years in Federal Prison

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1658708/posts
July 8-10, 2006 Camp-Out at the Halper Farm to Stop Eminent Domain

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1665464/posts
Eminent domain foes to protest eviction, Halpers must quit farm by Monday (FRee Republic Mentioned)


21 posted on 07/20/2006 6:22:55 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

http://www.thnt.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060719/NEWS0102/607190386/1005

07/19/06

"My understanding is the writ of possession will be served (today); whether they'll evict (today) I don't know," Edward D. McKirdy said late yesterday afternoon.




http://www.c-n.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060720/NEWS/607200321

Thursday, July 20, 2006

The Halpers received official notification Wednesday they must leave their 75-acre tract when the Somerset County Sheriff's Department served 16-year-old Zachary Halper with a judge's order.

(snip)

But Clara and Larry Halper, along with their son Zachary, remained on the farm, likely assuring that seven years of acrimonious parlays, legal and otherwise, would continue until at least this afternoon.

Lawyers representing the Halpers, the township and Somerset County will attend a 1:30 conference this afternoon at which Middlesex County Superior Court Judge James P. Hurley will determine what type of action can be taken to oblige the Halpers off the property.

(snip)


22 posted on 07/20/2006 6:41:54 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Not 10 Acres. 75 acres.


23 posted on 07/20/2006 6:42:31 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
This is rhe Halper case. Lots of thread on it here at FR.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1658708/posts

24 posted on 07/20/2006 6:45:41 AM PDT by mware (Americans in armchairs doing the job of the media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

He said 10, 75 changes things a bit. Still a fat pile of money to leave on the table.


25 posted on 07/20/2006 7:56:42 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Not everything has a price tag.


26 posted on 07/20/2006 7:58:54 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

No, everything has a price tag, the only question is how big.


27 posted on 07/20/2006 8:02:57 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Though the 5th allows taking with just compensation for 'public use', the USSC in Kelo changed that to 'public purpose'. That's the significant issue in all this. The USSC amended the United States Constitution without having to get a 2/3 vote in the Senate or approval by 3/4 of the States.


28 posted on 07/20/2006 8:04:20 AM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Not everything has a price tag to all people.


29 posted on 07/20/2006 8:05:10 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

People who don't think everything has a price tag just haven't been made the right offer yet. Since the first time one hominid traded another hominid for something or some activity EVERYTHING has been for sale. Goods, land, services, souls, it's all for sale; and it always will be.


30 posted on 07/20/2006 8:09:22 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Nope


31 posted on 07/20/2006 8:13:36 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill
The township wouldn't have thought of doing this before the Supreme Court ruling, but now it seems the governments feel they have Carte Blanch to seize property.

It's going to be happening to me in the next few years, thanks to my bwitch step monster selling my dad's land to the city. They bought 180 acres from him and now they own the land on both sides of me, and my ex husband is a city councilman. My days are numbered. With me gone, they can build a big facility of some kind. With me here, it divides up their land. Last year the mayor was fighting with a local businessman and he said if the man didn't do what he wanted he'd take his property by eminent domain, so I know they'll do it to me too. In a heart beat.

32 posted on 07/20/2006 8:18:04 AM PDT by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Sorry but thousands of years of recorded human history shows I'm right. There's a set of circumstances that could arise in your life where you'd do anything for a ham sandwich, there's also a fat enough pile of money out there that would entice you to do just about anything. That's the simple reality, and people who don't believe it just haven't spent enough time in the dank icky corners of their brain.


33 posted on 07/20/2006 8:18:50 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: discostu

>>>>there's also a fat enough pile of money out there that would entice you to do just about anything.

Nope. Not everyone thinks like you.


34 posted on 07/20/2006 8:25:30 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

It's not a matter of thinking like me. It's a matter of reality. It's the first rule of the spy world: everybody has a price you just have to figure out what it is and if they're worth it. It's easy to claim you don't have a price when there's no substantive offer on the table, reality is different.


35 posted on 07/20/2006 8:31:27 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: discostu
You are awfully cocky. Really rather just awful.

You have no idea if I've ever had prices on the table.

I can assure. Not everything I have is for sale.

If I was alone in that state of mind, there wouldn't be laws or rules to protect people from morally corrupt people.
36 posted on 07/20/2006 8:36:32 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

It's not cocky, just aknowledging the proven history of mankind. Actually I do know you've never had a proper price on the table, I know this because you insist that you can't be bought. Only people who've never had to make the tough version of that call have the luxury to insist there are things they would never sell.

Actually you've got it exactly backwards. We need those laws to protect people from the morally corrupt BECAUSE everybody is for sale. Attacking moments of weakness is how the morally corrupt make those really nasty buys that we have made against the law. If it were not possible for circumstances to arrive where anybody would make that sale it would be unnecessary to have those laws.


37 posted on 07/20/2006 8:41:29 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: discostu

>>>We need those laws to protect people from the morally corrupt BECAUSE everybody is for sale.

Nope


38 posted on 07/20/2006 8:45:14 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Yes. If people didn't make destructive trades we wouldn't need laws to govern and occassionally eradictate those trades.


39 posted on 07/20/2006 8:50:05 AM PDT by discostu (you must be joking son, where did you get those shoes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: discostu

If you want to generalize fine. But generalizations do not include everyone. Not everyone is morally bankrupt. No matter how you try to justify that in your head.


40 posted on 07/20/2006 8:51:13 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson