Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scout Snipers Break in New Rifles
Marine Corps News | ^ | July 10, 2006 | Lcpl. Aaron J. Rock

Posted on 07/17/2006 8:35:45 AM PDT by STD

Scout Snipers Break in New Rifles

Ft. A.P. Hill, VA. - Scout Snipers from the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit's Battalion Landing Team, 2nd Bn., 2nd Marine Regiment, fired their new rifles for the first time on a range here today.

The BLT Marines will use the new MK-11 semi-automatic sniper rifle simultaneously alongside the bolt-action M40A3, a descendent of the Vietnam-era M40.

The rifle resembles an M-16 on first glance, and Sgt. Gerald V. Gavin, Scout Sniper Platoon commander, said the resemblance can benefit operations on today's urban battlefields.

Gavin said the distinct look of the M40A3 makes identifying a sniper in an infantry patrol easier. The MK-11 allows the sniper to better blend in with the infantry, making them less vulnerable.

Gavin said the semi-automatic action on the new rifle, as well as the addition of a suppressor system that reduces muzzle flash and report, make it a valuable addition to the inventory.

The MK-11 comes fitted with the Scout Sniper Day Scope (SSDS), which the Marine Corps also is attaching to its existing inventory of M40A3s.

Gavin said the new scope improves the snipers ability to engage targets, offering enhanced sighting ability and ease of use. "It's a great piece of glass," he said.

Lance Cpl. James K. Dagenhart agreed with Gavin's opinion of the MK-11, and said he prefers the MK-11.

"I like it because it's semi-auto, and I love the scope. . . the new scope is money," Dagenhart said.

The MK-11 weighs 18.29 pounds fully loaded with its two-pound suppressor attached, while the M40A3 weighs in at 18.5 fully loaded.

Both rifles fire the same 7.62 mm round, and the MK-11 is accurate up to 800 yards.

Gavin said he thinks the MK-11 is a great weapon, although he is still partial to his experience with the M40A3.

The BLT and Scout Snipers will continue to train with the MEU's Aviation and Logistics Combat Elements here until the end of the month. The training at Fort A.P. Hill is the MEU's first step in a six-month pre-deployment training process designed to merge the disparate elements of the MEU into a cohesive, rapid reaction force. The 26th MEU will continue to prepare for an early 2007 deployment in support of the Global War on Terrorism. Sound Off...What do you think? Join the discussion.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; marine; marines; mk11; newsniperrifle; scout; scoutsnipers; snipers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last
She sure looks nice! I wonder if she's made by those fine folks at Armalite?
1 posted on 07/17/2006 8:35:47 AM PDT by STD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STD

I think the Mk11 is the Knights SR-25.
The Army SASS is built on the Armalite, IIRC.

DISCLAIMER:
I'm sure someone other (than me) fat, white, early 40's 200+ lb Mall Ninja (4th Degree) will be along to chime in.
If I had to run from the couch to the fridge for more Fritos dip I'd have to stop and rest half way, but I can recall useless trivia about interesting things in a single bound.


2 posted on 07/17/2006 8:40:29 AM PDT by nerdwithamachinegun (All generalizations are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD
Civilian version will set you back over $7,000 but is guaranteed sub 1 MOA.
3 posted on 07/17/2006 8:40:38 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD
I'd prefer an AI in .338 Lapua but you do get a fast 2nd shot.
But maintance on the SR25 is similar to M4.
4 posted on 07/17/2006 8:44:43 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STD

Photos! What happened to the rules?


5 posted on 07/17/2006 8:45:46 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Looks like an AR10 with a suppressor.


6 posted on 07/17/2006 8:50:54 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692 Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Marine_Mk11_Mod0.jpg


7 posted on 07/17/2006 8:51:05 AM PDT by Greystoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

8 posted on 07/17/2006 8:51:55 AM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Greystoke; NY.SS-Bar9

Thanks. I want.


9 posted on 07/17/2006 8:52:42 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: STD

Will the Semi's be as accurate? Never found a auto/semi to be as accurate as bolt action.


10 posted on 07/17/2006 8:52:54 AM PDT by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Why is he shooting through a croquet hoop?


11 posted on 07/17/2006 8:55:24 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: devane617

The more moving parts from ignition to exit out of the end of the barrel, the more the barrel vibrates, like a tuning fork, and is in a dirrent place than the last time the bullet exited.


12 posted on 07/17/2006 8:56:52 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STD

Marine Corps gun control: "One shot, one kill."

Semper Fi,
Kelly


13 posted on 07/17/2006 8:56:56 AM PDT by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

Have you never played croquet to the death?


14 posted on 07/17/2006 9:01:48 AM PDT by true_blue_texican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: going hot

Kind of what I thought.


15 posted on 07/17/2006 9:02:39 AM PDT by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: devane617
True.

But a sniper is not driving tacks or trying to hit a ground hog at 400 yards. Note the effective range of 800 yards. Battlefield sniping is hitting a man sized target, 10 inch X ring.

Advantages of the simi-auto are follow on rounds (quick second shot) and the sniper does not have to move. Disadvantage is that brass flying through the air, but there are ways to fix that.
16 posted on 07/17/2006 9:05:40 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

It helps keep it fun.


17 posted on 07/17/2006 9:06:57 AM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
Why is he shooting through a croquet hoop?

No.......let me explain the nuance' of this style of shooting.

He is on the downrange end of the projectile (see iron target face down). The shooter pictured has to return fire and place his round down the muzzle of the originating weapon. Sometimes the elevation is a click off and the round ends up in the scope of the oppsing shooter ... but fortunately, Marine medics are pretty accomplished with bandaids and such.

18 posted on 07/17/2006 9:08:27 AM PDT by Fighting Irish (Ever find yourself posting messages just to show off your taglines?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: going hot

Not only is the AR platform as accurate as any bolt gun, it is much easier to build and the useful life of the barrel is twice as long.

Now if they would issue it in 7.62.


19 posted on 07/17/2006 9:09:46 AM PDT by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: devane617

I was wondering about the spent cartridges. I thought that one of the reasons to use a bolt action rifle was to control the spent ejection of the cartridge.


20 posted on 07/17/2006 9:09:55 AM PDT by Holicheese (Stanley Cup's new home IS North Carolina!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: STD

"Both rifles fire the same 7.62 mm round, and the MK-11 is accurate up to 800 yards"

One of these days I'm going to have to learn to read.


21 posted on 07/17/2006 9:12:53 AM PDT by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nerdwithamachinegun
I think the Mk11 is the Knights SR-25.

Would this make a scoped SR-25 qualify as a "service rifle" in the high-power rifle competition sense of the term?

22 posted on 07/17/2006 9:13:01 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: devane617
Will the Semi's be as accurate? Never found a auto/semi to be as accurate as bolt action.

Out of the box, an AR action is often more accurate than a bolt action. A highly tuned AR action is probably slightly less accurate than a highly tuned bolt action built from a good platform (like a Rem 700), but on any given day that may shave fractions of an inch at several hundred meters. Benchrest differences that generally won't affect a sniper in other words.

You are correct that most semi-autos are not as accurate as bolt guns, but the AR action is the exception to that rule. A few basic mods (part swaps) on an AR15 will have it running rings around your average bolt gun in the accuracy department. As the AR shows, semi-autos are not intrinsically inaccurate, it is just that most semi-autos were designed for uses where accuracy doesn't matter too much. The AR was designed for military purposes, but many aspects of its design make it an intrinsically accurate rifle.

In this new rifle, the Marines have an excellent sniper rifle that can also function as a battle rifle out of the box. Army SF has been using these particular rifles for ages already, so they are proven quantities. Extremely accurate.

23 posted on 07/17/2006 9:13:12 AM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

Looks like a Harris bipod. What are the optics - Leupold Mark 4 LR/T M2? Nice - and expensive.


24 posted on 07/17/2006 9:13:55 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: STD

The USMC and their newest toy. When you care enough to send the very best...500 meters downrange at a couple thousand feet per second.

}:-)4


25 posted on 07/17/2006 9:19:05 AM PDT by Moose4 (Dirka dirka Mohammed jihad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Yeah... that open action on (most) semi's is a terror on accuracy more times than not. although I have an acquaintance who says his russian SKS will do sub MOA if the barrel is cold.
My AK will barely do 2MOA with a cold barrel, on a good day, with match ammo. With that russian ammo, I'm lucky if it hits 3MOA.


26 posted on 07/17/2006 9:23:36 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
"Civilian version will set you back over $7,000 but is guaranteed sub 1 MOA."

FYI - the DPMS ar-10 will generally outshoot SR-25's and retails for about $800 (sans scope )

( for those who wish to support the 2nd :-)
27 posted on 07/17/2006 9:32:06 AM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STD

This can only be considered a supplement to the M 40. It doesn't have the range of the M 40 -1000 meters. Do I detect a change in the mission of the SCOUT snipers? Or are Scout-snipers a new PC name (later they'll drop the sniper portion like they've dropped the range of the weapon).


28 posted on 07/17/2006 9:35:42 AM PDT by ArtyFO (I love to smoke cigars when I adjust artillery fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

"Will the Semi's be as accurate? Never found a auto/semi to be as accurate as bolt action."

give or take nowadays 1 moa for semi's , and in the same price range, .5 to 1 moa for bolts.

dollar for dollar you will usually get better accuracy with a bolt. .


29 posted on 07/17/2006 9:35:47 AM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

Two words:
Safety
Nazis


30 posted on 07/17/2006 9:36:09 AM PDT by nerdwithamachinegun (All generalizations are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ArtyFO

"This can only be considered a supplement to the M 40. It doesn't have the range of the M 40 -1000 meters"

they also have .50 cals. seems like they could have a .50 per team for those lonnnng shots. (?)


31 posted on 07/17/2006 9:41:58 AM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
Why is he shooting through a croquet hoop?

That was my thought - maybe this is how they qualify, by hitting croquet balls?

32 posted on 07/17/2006 9:50:47 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VRing

The MK11 is 7.62mm. The Marines screwed up the DMR program 14 years ago when they could have purchased the same rifle. Internal rice bowl politics saw that the M14 DMR was selected. It was a failure. BTW, no semi-automatic weapon will ever exceed the accuracy of a bolt gun (tighter tolerances available on a bolt gun). The MK11 has its own problems. In the future look for the MK11 to be replaced by the Special Operations Combat Assualt Rifle, Sniper Version.


33 posted on 07/17/2006 9:51:09 AM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stompk; tcostell; tortoise; Holicheese; fireforeffect; going hot; STD
Wanna have fun testing your own Sniper skills? Come join us...

http://www.aaoutfitter.com/Prairie%20Dogs.htm


34 posted on 07/17/2006 9:51:34 AM PDT by devane617 (It's McCain and a Rat -- Now what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
A few basic mods (part swaps) on an AR15 will have it running rings around your average bolt gun in the accuracy department.

OK, let's hear 'em - which ones offer the biggest improvement, and what's the approximate cost (for those of us with ARs, who want to make real tackdrivers out of them)? Thanks.

35 posted on 07/17/2006 9:54:20 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Well, that would make sense but no, not in categories that us mere mortals compete in.

Fixed sights, no removable carry handles on AR types, mucho Garand/03 style reloads....

I still like the old school HPSR shoots though....


36 posted on 07/17/2006 9:56:29 AM PDT by nerdwithamachinegun (All generalizations are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stompk

Range is overemphasized sub funtion of sniping. Most 7.62mm shots in desert, open terrain are between 400 to 800 yards. Shots beyond 800 yards are rare and offer a low probability of hit. Today the snipers are working in urban terrain at shorter ranges with a great concern for rear security. What they want is a suppressed, semi-automatic rifle that allows for accurate shots but does not make noise and provides them with multiple (20 round magazine) follow-on shots if needed. The ranges snipers are engaging in Iraq is around 200 to 400 yards. This is within the operating range of the AK-47s. Afghanistan is where snipers are using their bolt guns and SASRs.


37 posted on 07/17/2006 9:56:43 AM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole; Ancesthntr
Why is he shooting through a croquet hoop?

That was my thought - maybe this is how they qualify, by hitting croquet balls

I can only guess that spot is exactly in line the target - where you are shooting exactly 90 dgress perpendicular to the target downrange. Maybe if you are off to the side a foot or two it could move the bullet an inch or two to the side by the time it hits the paper target.

() -----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

38 posted on 07/17/2006 10:02:02 AM PDT by Screaming_Gerbil (Let's Roll...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stompk
I've been looking at the AR-10. I have a tricked out tack driver (Remington 700 VS) that I've been thinking about selling and replacing. I really don't need 600 yard capability as most of the area that I now hunt is not so wide open.

Do you have experience with the AR-10? If so, what have your experiences been?
39 posted on 07/17/2006 10:02:29 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
Why is he shooting through a croquet hoop?

Becuase the target is so far down range that it can't be seen with the naked eye. The Croquet hoop helps him locate it from the others next to it.

40 posted on 07/17/2006 10:07:39 AM PDT by usmcobra (Human shields are people willing to die for terrorists and dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nerdwithamachinegun

I like the occasional John C. Garand matches ... I 'fit in' instead of feeling like Julius Caesar in a Buck Rogers world.


41 posted on 07/17/2006 10:22:52 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
for me, not working as a sniper, where one shot is absolutely critical, I prefer to have the quick follow up shot capability. at ranges under 800 yards, the ARs work great.

the AR weighs about 2/3 of my bolt rifle and is a better all around compromise. if I had to find myself in high weeds with only one rifle, I'd MUCH rather have the AR.

not as quiet with the silencer, but you can turn the gas down and it helps. . .
42 posted on 07/17/2006 10:23:13 AM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
OK, let's hear 'em - which ones offer the biggest improvement, and what's the approximate cost (for those of us with ARs, who want to make real tackdrivers out of them)?

There are only a few mods required to extract most of the capability out of a rack-grade AR. The cheap mods are to free float the barrel and replace the trigger with a match trigger (e.g. a Jewell), which together will run you a couple hundred bucks. These two mods will have you shooting sub-MOA all day if you use decent ammo and the barrel isn't total crap. The only other mod worth mentioning is installing a good match barrel, which can run some serious bucks. These three mods, plus good match ammo, you'll have a very competitive shooter. It won't be benchrest accurate, but only the benchrest guys would notice. One would have to drop a lot of dough on a bolt gun to compete with the accuracy. You can find a lot of information on accurizing ARs on the Internet, and reliably getting impressive accuracy out of it is not terribly hard -- the mods are easily done by any amateur home AR mechanic.

43 posted on 07/17/2006 11:07:09 AM PDT by tortoise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: VRing

"Not only is the AR platform as accurate as any bolt gun, it is much easier to build and the useful life of the barrel is twice as long.

Now if they would issue it in 7.62."

You won't get any semi as accurate as a bolt gun... but it is easier to build and the barrel life is close to being the same as on a bolt gun if not a bit shorter. The AR10 is in .308 also known as 7.62x51mm.

Having built some very accurate semi's and some precision bolt guns in my day, there is no way to make a semi reliable and consistant while maintaining the kind of accuracy that a precision bolt action rifle like the M40 achieves.

Mike


44 posted on 07/17/2006 11:13:50 AM PDT by BCR #226 (Abortion is the pagan sacrifice of an innocent virgin child for the sins of the mother and father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

I need to get a Garand. I have a very low number 03A3 that looks unissued and I shoot it a couple times a year but a mongrel Garand would be sweet....

A couple of years ago I fired an SR-25 that was made to resemble the Mk-11Mod0. It was interesting.
Much easier to shoot sub-MOA than an M14 but very intolerant of dirt.


45 posted on 07/17/2006 11:20:53 AM PDT by nerdwithamachinegun (All generalizations are wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: STD

I'm used to shooting heavier 45 cal rounds but I am curious what the specs of the round are.

Bullet weight?
Grains of powder?

is this 7.62 round a 39 or 54 grain version?


46 posted on 07/17/2006 11:23:27 AM PDT by TexanToTheCore (This space for hire...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole
Why is he shooting through a croquet hoop?

Take that, Alice! And your little white rabbit, too!

47 posted on 07/17/2006 11:30:36 AM PDT by LexBaird ("Politically Correct" is the politically correct term for "F*cking Retarded". - Psycho Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

"there is no way to make a semi reliable and consistant while maintaining the kind of accuracy that a precision bolt action rifle like the M40 achieves."

If you are talking about M14s I'll agree with you but the AR platform is different. The advantages are simple - Threaded collar over threaded collar barrel attachment, no bedding to perfect or go bad, no gas piston/op rod harmonics to be concerned with. Building a sub minute AR is as simple as buying good parts and screwing them together. Anyone can do it.

The real difference between a bolt gun and a semi is in trigger control. A bolt gun allows the shooter to milk the trigger, constantly improving the sight picture until the rifle fires. A gas gun requires the shooter to pull more quickly and follow through by pinning the trigger back while the gun recoils. Failure to do this will often lead to doubles as the rifle recoils away from the trigger finger, resets, then runs into the finger again on it's way back forward. This is often seen on gas guns with rather light triggers and inexperienced operators.

One has to remember that the gas guns will be issued to "designated marksmen" and that it will be perfect for this role. The Corps will retain the outstanding M40 for "precision" work.


48 posted on 07/17/2006 11:46:57 AM PDT by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TexanToTheCore

"Bullet weight?
Grains of powder?

is this 7.62 round a 39 or 54 grain version?"

Standard 7.62 NATO round. The ball round is a 147 grain spitzer boat tail FMJ at 2700 FPS. The "long range" round is the M852, a 168 grain HPBT at 2600 FPS. The "grains of powder" is impossible to answer as the factories get powder by the train car load. Every load has slightly different properties and the powder charge varies accordingly.

I think you are confused about "a 39 or 54 grain version". The two common Com-Bloc .30s have case lengths of 39 and 54 millimeters. The NATO round has a case length of 51 millimeters.


49 posted on 07/17/2006 11:58:28 AM PDT by VRing (Happiness is a perfect sling bruise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: VRing

The standard issue accuratized ammo is M118LR. I don't know the weights and grains, you could look it up. Lake City makes it.


50 posted on 07/17/2006 12:05:54 PM PDT by tigtog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson