Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message hereLibertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message hereLeast he's not into the kiddies.
Barney Frank flew into a rage on the House floor over this until someone told him it's about the OTHER kind of crack, not the one HE'S addicted to, but the Marion Barry type....
Taxing illegal drugs is funny - the government trying to have it both ways. At least this judge has his head screwed on right.
Does this also make the National Firearms Act, which is based on the Harrison Narcotics Act, unconstitutional? Or would it if this were a federal case? Certainly the same logic applies.
The Feds have charged big time drug people with tax evasion for not paying taxes on their profits in the past.
The logic of it has always escaped me. How are they supposed to report the income in order to pay taxes on it?
Twilight Zone
But the tax on a child's teddy bear... that's allowed.
Not being a fan of taxes, I'll take what I can get. Reducing taxation will always be a good thing for as long as I'm alive.
How can you tax something that's illegal? Illegal almost equals invisible.
(Or how do you tax SOMEONE that's illegal)
When I first saw this article I thought they were talking about kids with their pants hanging below their waist showing their underwear. I was gonna say instead of taxing them they should fine them for indecency.
Government (state, local, and da fedz) trying to find more money schemes to fund their enormous debt.
Should the state have to prove that I was actually productive before it punishes my productivity with an income tax?
Good decision.
Isn't this the way they caught Al Capone????
This judge must have been snorting some hot stuff before he came up with this decision. They should check his nostrils out.
