Posted on 07/16/2006 12:43:18 PM PDT by doug from upland
Is she for or against gay marriage? For or against the war on terror? For or against the 2nd Amendment? For our against the expression of religious values? Does anyone know for what Hillary really stands?
The answer is that Hillary stands for Hillary. She will do and say anything to any group if she sees an advantage.
In this 1996 clip, Hillary is speaking to a group of Democrats. She is telling them something that we all know. She will try to fool enough voters to gain the ultimate political power, and then WATCH OUT. If she is free to be her "real self," a totalitarian leftist will be in the White House with nothing to stand in her way of exercising that totalitarian power.
"...to see what happens after the election when Al and I feel totally at ease to be our real selves."
Does that scare anyone?
sheesh
Going to have to miss it, I will not use Real Audio
Lets send Hillary (WIDE LOAD) to the Middle EAST, and see what kind of BS she will dish out !
Oh yeah. I have a healthy fear of this Alinsky acolyte.
She is capable of winning the presidency, and she doesn't much care for dissenting opinion. You can bet that unsaid in her presidential campain performances would be just how she plans to "deal" with with those who might want to express an opinion that differs from hers.
What we at F.R. would call repression, she might term silencing the enemies of the "people".
.
Could you explain that further? Is their a problem with using real audio that others should know about?
"The safety of this file cannot be determined."
Doug, is that usual for that site? I'm afraid to download it, but I want to know what Hitlery has said.
G-d forbid, she would find that there is a lot between her and totalitarian power.
We are not sheep. We have plenty of former soldiers. A pack, not a herd.
The democrats have difficulty recruiting warriors. Those opposed to them have no difficulty in finding them.
A vote for Hillary is a vote for civil war. Perhaps you recall from Clinton's administration the Ruby Ridge and Waco fiascos. All that stopped very suddenly after Tim McVeigh and his conspirators bombed the federal building.
I don't support what McVeigh did. I do not think that what WJ Clinton and his federal agencies had done to that point justified that approach.
I do see where sufficient unconstituional activity could push more people into the camp where that approach would seem appropriate.
I can just imagine that all federal buildings will be arranged to put day care centers on the ground floor, with mandatory bussing from all schools in the area, public and private. I can see her and her minions hiding behind the children physically, as well as in her policy rationales.
I sincerely hope that I am wrong about her. It is regrettable that a fairly rational and educated person would think so poorly of any elected official.
No, just personal preference. I have Quick Time and Windows Media Player, did not want a third player.
Copy the link and bring it into your Windows Media Player.
I didn't get that safety prompt. I don't know what to tell you.
The Ruby Ridge episode occurred when GHW Bush was president, not ol' Vacuum Nose. As Casey Stengel used to be fond of saying, ''You could look it up.''
OMG! Thanks so much for the correction!
This could be used to describe just about every democrat politician. But the Clinton's are on the top of that rubbish heap.
Me too. Real player has been banned from my machines for several years now.
Hmmmmm. I just did get that prompt. I had saved it and actually got it to play in my WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER.
They are way on top of that heap.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.