Replies

Ok, let's take the opposite view:

1. This is the the premise: Serbs for no particular reason -- no history of persecuting Moslems, no racist ideology in any of their historical literature, no military or strategic advantage to be gained -- simply line up 8,000 men & boys (after seperating out the women) and just kill them for the hell of it.

However, no military satellite photos exist showing a trace of the Srebrenica event, before or after it happened -- in spite of the fact that the area was under constant military and satellite surveilance by the US and UN. Some Muslims who they were supposed to have "killed" actually start showing up alive in other places. Nowhere near the number of bodies that are supposed to be there, are found -- in spite of there having been an ongoing war, and two previous World Wars in the same neighborhood, so there should have been lots of bodies, even unrelated to the Srebrenica event for them to use as "evidence" if they wanted to fake it. The fact that Naser Oric uses Srebrenica as a staging point for military excursions which kill over a thousand Serbs in the surrounding area, is completely ignored by the UN & media. The fact that a non-Serb reporter says that he had film footage of Muslims killing Serbs in the neighborhood and turned it over to the ICTY, but now that film is MIA, is ignored. The fact that more people today know about "Srebrenica" as an (anti-Serb) event than know about Operation Storm which killed far more people (including women, children and old people) and completely and PERMANENTLY displaced a couple hundred thousand Serbs forever (pro-Serb), is ignored.

And just how preposterous does that sound to you? Because it sounds pretty damn weird to me!

2. Markale (1& 2). Your premise is that they were not set-ups, the came from Serbs firing mortars into the crowds.

But, the surgeon who worked on the people says that all the physical damage to the victims wasn't consistent with mortars -- it was all below the waist like a planted explosive. The Serbs were not even in firing range in one or both case. The street was closed off and the cameras were set-up for "an event" -- and then the supposedly "random event" -- Serbs firing a mortar at that spot, happened.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.......Bizarre.

3. Your premise: Racak was a real "massacre of Albanians".

However, Finnish forensic pathologists who investigated the scene for the EU, says it was not: http://www.mediamonitors.net/gowans1.html

4. Your premise: NATO bombing (did not drive) K-Albanians out of Kosovo. The K-Albanians civilians stayed in their homes and went about their business as usual, while 78 days of NATO bombs went off everywhere around them -- only waiting for the Serbs to show up to "drive them all out". And the Serbs had time to do this, while under fire from the KLA and the NATO Bombs -- and also while supposedly committing other "massacres".

That is so stupid an idea that anyone with a lick of common sense can see through it in under a minute, if they think about it.

5. Your premise: "The KLA is (not) a franchise of Al Qaida". The KLA was so noble in its quest for independence, that -- unlike Bosnia-- it refused help from Al Qaida.

The fact that the Semtex used in the London and Spain bombings by Al Qaeda came from Muslim Kosovo is just "a coincidence". The fact that Al Qaeda profits from the drug and sex slavery trade, and Kosovo is a Muslim command point for all the drugs and sex slaves coming into Western Europe, is also just "a coincidence". The appearance of Osama bin Laden in Albania a few years prior to the NATO bombing is equally "a coincidence" -- as are all the Saudi mosques being built in Kosovo and all the Serbian Orthodox Churchs being torn down!

Again, one would have to be a complete idiot to believe any of the above.

According to you and your ideas, Serbs would have to be the best MAGICIANS on the face of the earth -- appearing where they are not, making thing appear and disappear, creating isllusions that don't exist -- AND, they would have to be using that unbelievable magical power, not for their betterment, but instead to completely screw themselves!

How many ways can you spell, "SET UP"?

1. Srebrenica was a setup.
2. Markale was a setup. (1 & 2)
3. Racak was a setup.
4. NATO bombing drove K-Albanians out of Kosovo.
5. The KLA is a franchise of Al Qaida.

Finally.....I'm proud of you Hoplite. you have finally come to terms with the truth. Items 1-3, absolutely. Item 4 is debatable as the Serbian paramilitaries did murder POW's, rapes were committed, and rumors of more than what actually happened was circulated by KLA members. The NATO bombing as directed by Clark was indiscrimate and badly orchestrated or was on purpose, whichever is not a good thing. The KLA was not a franchise of Al Qaida, KLA incorporated Muh fighters from Afghanistan and other locations. Al Qaida has tried to join but was not very successful in joining the fight. We can talk about this relationship for half a book....The KLA was an entity trained by CIA, to fight the Serbs, bringing in as members the Muh we befriended in Afghanistan during their fight against the Russians.