Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigh4u2
Nothing there indicates that the SCOTUS would lift the block. Matter of fact, it's just the opposite.

Exactly. Kennedy's opinion reads so much against lifting the block (and he seems to be hinting to the lower courts, both the federal and the state, that they better get the law right) that the only explanation for this lawyer's statement is absurd spin. Justice Kennedy also says that he has considered whether the votes to grant cert in the future exist, and he thinks that they are there.
6 posted on 07/07/2006 8:43:29 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: NinoFan
(and he seems to be hinting to the lower courts, both the federal and the state, that they better get the law right)

This was my take on it also.

The lawyer is a kook and so is his client. This town voted overwhelmingly to keep the Cross right where it is.

7 posted on 07/07/2006 8:48:56 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (What's so hard to understand about the word illegal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson