Can someone help me here? Wasn't there a ruling or something that had to do with tradition that can be used as an argument here?
sorry for not replying earlier,
technically the cross or specific area in question has been a war memorial for years if I am not mistaken, it hasn't been under federal control tho.
it was up to the city to continue to pursue legal action after the Judge shot them down in the latest round of legal action. They chose to do so with assistance from others and that is where we are today from a stay standpoint.
Congressional action to provide for relief may also be in the offing, so who knows how this may end, for now , the cross stands.. odds look much better than a few months ago, after the city voted in favor of a measure to keep it there thru whatever means necessary.. but the Judge ruled otherwise