Posted on 07/06/2006 9:29:22 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
WASHINGTON (AP) - When "say," "they" and "weigh" rhyme, but "bomb," "comb" and "tomb" don't, wuudn't it maek mor sens to spel wurdz the wae thae sound?
Those in favor of simplified spelling say children would learn faster and illiteracy rates would drop. Opponents say a new system would make spelling even more confusing.
Eether wae, the consept has yet to capcher th publix imajinaeshun.
It's been 100 years since Andrew Carnegie helped create the Simplified Spelling Board to promote a retooling of written English and President Theodore Roosevelt tried to force the government to use simplified spelling in its publications. But advocates aren't giving up.
They even picket the national spelling bee finals, held every year in Washington, costumed as bumble bees and hoisting signs that say "Enuf is enuf but enough is too much" or "I'm thru with through." Thae sae th bee selebraets th ability of a fue stoodents to master a dificult sistem that stumps meny utherz hoo cuud do just as wel if speling were simpler.
"It's a very difficult thing to get something accepted like this," says Alan Mole, president of the American Literacy Council, which favors an end to "illogical spelling." The group says English has 42 sounds spelled in a bewildering 400 ways.
Americans doen't aulwaez go for whut's eezy - witnes th faeluer of th metric sistem to cach on. But propoenents of simpler speling noet that a smatering of aulterd spelingz hav maed th leep into evrydae ues.
Doughnut also is donut; colour, honour and labour long ago lost the British "u" and the similarly derived theatre and centre have been replaced by the easier-to-sound-out theater and center.
"The kinds of progress that we're seeing are that someone will spell night 'nite' and someone will spell through 'thru,'" Mole said. "We try to show where these spellings are used and to show dictionary makers that they are used so they will include them as alternate spellings."
"Great changes have been made in the past. Systems can change," a hopeful Mole said.
Lurning English reqierz roet memory rather than lojic, he sed.
In languages with phonetically spelled words, like German or Spanish, children learn to spell in weeks instead of months or years as is sometimes the case with English, Mole said.
But education professor Donald Bear said to simplify spelling would probably make it more difficult because words get meaning from their prefixes, suffixes and roots.
"Students come to understand how meaning is preserved in the way words are spelled," said Bear, director of the E.L. Cord Foundation Center for Learning and Literacy at the University of Nevada, Reno.
Michael Marks, a member of the National Education Association's executive committee, said learning would be disrupted if children had to switch to a different spelling system. "It may be more trouble than it's worth," said Marks, a debate and theater teacher at Hattiesburg High School in Mississippi.
E-mail and text messages are exerting a similar tug on the language, sharing some elements with the simplified spelling movement while differing in other ways. Electronic communications stress shortcuts like "u" more than phonetics. Simplified spelling is not always shorter than regular spelling - sistem instead of system, hoep instead of hope.
Carnegie tried to moov thingz along in 1906 when he helpt establish and fund th speling bord. He aulso uezd simplified speling in his correspondens, and askt enywun hoo reported to him to do the saem.
A filanthropist, he becaem pashunet about th ishoo after speeking with Melvil Dewey, a speling reform activist and Dewey Desimal sistem inventor hoo simplified his furst naem bi droping "le" frum Melville.
Roosevelt tried to get the government to adopt simpler spellings for 300 words but Congress blocked him. He used simple spellings in all White House memos, pressing forward his effort to "make our spelling a little less foolish and fantastic."
The Chicago Tribune aulso got into th act, uezing simpler spelingz in th nuezpaeper for about 40 years, ending in 1975. Plae-riet George Bernard Shaw, hoo roet moest of his mateerial in shorthand, left muny in his wil for th development of a nue English alfabet.
Carnegie, Dewey, Roosevelt and Shaw's work followed attempts by Benjamin Franklin, Daniel Webster and Mark Twain to advance simpler spelling. Twain lobbied The Associated Press at its 1906 annual meeting to "adopt and use our simplified forms and spread them to the ends of the earth." AP declined.
But for aul th hi-proefiel and skolarly eforts, the iedeea of funy-luuking but simpler spelingz didn't captivaet the masez then - or now.
"I think that the average person simply did not see this as a needed change or a necessary change or something that was ... going to change their lives for the better," said Marilyn Cocchiola Holt, manager of the Pennsylvania department of the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh.
Carnegie, hoo embraest teknolojy, died in 1919, wel befor sel foenz. Had he livd, he probably wuud hav bin pleezd to no that milyonz of peepl send text and instant mesejez evry dae uezing thair oen formz of simplified speling: "Hav a gr8 day!"
Isn't illiteracy like 1% of the adult population? It seems a bit overkill to change the way all of us spell just to make it easier for the 1 percent who won't bother to learn.
"Isn't illiteracy like 1% of the adult population? It seems a bit overkill to change the way all of us spell just to make it easier for the 1 percent who won't bother to learn."
Hmm...that depends on your definition of illiteracy, I think. The percentage of folks who are not even marginally proficient at reading and writing is much higher.
And don't even get me started on spelling. A browse through the pages of Free Republic is quite shocking...quite shocking, indeed.
Is that the firewall or the far wall?
"Is that the firewall or the far wall?
"
You really have to look at the context, I guess.
I've seen many version of this same joke. This isn't the best or the most detailed, but it's the one I found the quickest:
In a small Southern town there was a nativity scene that indicated great skill and talent in its creation. One small feature bothered me though. The three wise men were wearing firemen's helmets.
Totally unable to come up with a reason or explanation, I left. At a "Quik Stop" on the edge of town, I asked the lady behind the counter about the helmets. She exploded into a rage, yelling at me, "You darn Yankees never do read the Bible!"
I assured her that I did, but simply couldn't recall anything about firemen in the Bible. She jerked her Bible from behind the counter and ruffled through some pages, and finally jabbed her finger at a particular passage.
Sticking it in my face she said, "See, it says right here, 'The three wise men came from afar.'"
Very nice!
How far a throw is this from, say, NewSpeak?
'1984' was not a novel. It was a modern training manual.
As several have pointed out already, and as I pointer out on the other thread, it is impossible to overlay a universal pronucuation-based spelling system on a language which does not have a univeral pronuciation.
I guarantee this Yinzer doesn't pronounce his vowels and consonants the same way that someone in Louisiana or London does. For instance in a such a system based on my speech patterns, the words "towel" and "tile" would be spelled the same.
Some people say "are," "our" and "hour" differently. Some say them all the same. How do you account for that?
SD
This is from Romanov's Russian-English/English-Russian Dictionary Washington Square Press, 1964), from a note attached to the table showing the alphabet.
Yeah. Those letters were rightly removed from the cyrillic alphabet, I think. I've had occasion to read some pre-revolutionary writing in Russian. It really wasn't a problem for me, once I learned those few new letters.
Church Slavonic, as used in Russian Orthodox churches, however, retains the full alphabet.
Languages are fascinating, aren't they?
As Churchill once said, (or maybe not) "This is the sort of English up with which I will not put"!
You beat me Famishus!
I do, and I'm a great speller. Do it gradually though, letter by letter. One letter, one sound. I'd start with G; there's no excuse whatsoever for it sounding like F or J.
i suport da publik skool sistim
SD
Thankfully you are not teaching in our private school.
Kids there learn how to spell phonetically along with rules for exceptions.
My biggest gripe is when folks don't know the difference between "then" and "than".
Mine is using apostrophe s ("'s") to make a word plural instead of just "s".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.