Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Push for easier spelling persists despite lack of public interest
http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/070606/nat_070606038.shtml ^ | Thursday, July 6, 2006 | AP

Posted on 07/06/2006 9:29:22 AM PDT by WestTexasWend

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: MineralMan

Good point. Shows how little thought is put into these "movements". No wonder they can't spell. They are not very bright at all.


21 posted on 07/06/2006 9:47:08 AM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
(stolen fron Gallagher)
the "wuh" sound is a stumper.
the word "one" has a "wuh" sound but no "w"
the word "two" doesn't have a "wuh" sound but has a "w".
________________________________
i before e except after c.
Einstein has it wrong twice in his name.
And in good conscience, that weighs heavily on me, neighbor, and makes my veins pop out, giving me a heinous look that neither forfeits nor deigns my right to use this rule neigh on indefinitely.
22 posted on 07/06/2006 9:48:02 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

We need an American St. Cyril to devise a phonetic alphabet for English. At present, we don't have one.


23 posted on 07/06/2006 9:50:27 AM PDT by tomzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Lord Jesus, please deliver us from the lunatics!


24 posted on 07/06/2006 9:51:28 AM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Wel, I must sae that thiss iz a readickulus eyedeeuh. How stoopid kan u b?


25 posted on 07/06/2006 9:52:14 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Sometimes those who scream loudest for "justice" are the ones that want real justice the least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Ahmo -- regional dialect for "I am going to"

presenunitedstates -- universal these days for President of The United States. This one really, really ticks me off. Bunch of lazy-assed people who can't be bothered to actually say separate words.


26 posted on 07/06/2006 9:54:06 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
They even picket the national spelling bee finals, held every year in Washington, costumed as bumble bees and hoisting signs that say "Enuf is enuf but enough is too much" or "I'm thru with through."

They have the TIME to protest, of course.

They keep writing their own resume`s, and maiing them out, but for some reason, the DPW refuses to hire them as garbage collectors or ditch diggers.

27 posted on 07/06/2006 9:55:19 AM PDT by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Have you read Jeff Foxworthy's redneck dictionary?


28 posted on 07/06/2006 9:56:24 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Sometimes those who scream loudest for "justice" are the ones that want real justice the least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Why is it stupid?

Only English and French have spelling so utterly divorced from the pronunciation of the language. Is it really a good thing that Samuel Johnson froze the spelling of English spelling a few generations before the previously fluid spelling would have simplified itself naturally?

Sure the parodic phonetic spellings given are absurd (Who actually pronounces "capture" "capcher"?). It's been done before: Korean is written with a constructed script that actually gives instruction on how to form the mouth to make the sounds once one knows the system, the Scandinavian languages have all undergone spelling reforms, the Chicoms simplified their pictographic script, Russian was given a rational system of spelling when the Rus converted to Orthodoxy.

We Americans even simplified our spelling so that our children have coloring books, not colouring books, and we harmonize rather than harmonise. I guess Noah Webster was stupid for doing that?


29 posted on 07/06/2006 9:57:54 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

"Have you read Jeff Foxworthy's redneck dictionary?"

I haven't, and if you ask me again, ahmo kick your a$$! [grin]


30 posted on 07/06/2006 9:58:01 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

LOL.


31 posted on 07/06/2006 9:58:37 AM PDT by WinOne4TheGipper (Sometimes those who scream loudest for "justice" are the ones that want real justice the least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
You missed one...

European - "Ah'm tellin' ya, y'all drink too much beer and european all night long..."

32 posted on 07/06/2006 9:59:05 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("How'd you get that scar, mister?" "Nicked myself shaving.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

why is it stupid ?

cause it becomes ebonics for white people and that ends up makin Mad Max Waters right.

can't have that.


33 posted on 07/06/2006 10:05:38 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

ptrn recagntion alows us undrstnd all knds ov wrtin stuf at a glance. try it yorself -- its amazng! Ov corse many ar usng a sort ov intrnet short hnd alrdy.


34 posted on 07/06/2006 10:06:22 AM PDT by siznartuf (If I Hear "Jobs Americans Won't Do" One More ^%&^%^%# Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Hex

tar arn - used to remove hubcaps and lugnuts from automobile wheels..


35 posted on 07/06/2006 10:06:25 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

You have a point, but there are several problems with it. When reading silently, the spellings of the words give important clues to the meanings. Since English is a hodge-podge language, made up of borrowings from many other languages, the spelling of words enhances our ability to understand what is being written.

Further, with as many homophones as exist in English, reading would be very difficult if they were spelled alike.

There, their, and they're are good examples of this. Each spelling adds information to the written word.

My other example of regional pronunciation differences is another reason to retain current spellings. It's even worse in England.


36 posted on 07/06/2006 10:07:03 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

True. I first heard of this stupid idea in the late 60s. I thought then -- and think now -- that the main thrust is to cut off students even more from access to the past. It's not enough that the textbooks are full of left-wing propaganda; what if someone should actually read, for example, the founding documents.


37 posted on 07/06/2006 10:08:04 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

This looks like ITA spelling from the 1960's


38 posted on 07/06/2006 10:09:30 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (Don't you think it's interesting how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

The Bolsheviks simplified Russian spelling after they took over. The pre-Revolutionary alphabet had several redundant letters which represented the same sound.


39 posted on 07/06/2006 10:10:10 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

"The Bolsheviks simplified Russian spelling after they took over. The pre-Revolutionary alphabet had several redundant letters which represented the same sound."

Correct. Earlier Russian is as easy to pronounce as modern Russian, but there were some supernumerary letters, at least one of which, the tvyordisnak, did not have a sound at all, and was truly redundant. They did retain the myakisnak, however, since it did modify the pronunciation of the preceding consonant, even though it, too, has no sound of its own.


40 posted on 07/06/2006 10:18:54 AM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson