Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L98Fiero
I'm not sure about that. Sounds like a Privacy Act violation to me. DD214 is subject to that as is his diagnosis from the Doc.

Well, I don't know about violations of the Privacy Act, but it would seem that the reason for his discharge would be a matter of public record.

15 posted on 07/05/2006 11:02:31 AM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

"Well, I don't know about violations of the Privacy Act, but it would seem that the reason for his discharge would be a matter of public record."

I'm not gonna swear to it but I do not think that is the case. Type of discharge is public record, reason for discharge is another matter, I believe. I was in personnel in the Navy and prepared a fair amount of paperwork including DD124s. When I was in, the top, "original" copy (carbon paper back then)of the DD214 did not have that info on it. The extended footer-type part on the second copy had that info. Not for public eyes, if I remember correctly. Maybe someone can help me out.


19 posted on 07/05/2006 12:50:50 PM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson