Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brytani
What the WSJ published was declassified, and came from authorized sources. That is not the case with what the Times printed.
78 posted on 06/30/2006 11:58:26 AM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Gumlegs

I kept hearing Wolf Blitzer saying that all this information was in public domain...what a big fat liar. Yes, the President said we were looking at banking information....I think most assumed that would be wire transfers coming into the United States....and not all wire transfers throughout Europe.


81 posted on 06/30/2006 12:01:01 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs


But why was it declassified, and who was the authorized source? And, if the WSJ is working in the best interests of the U.S., why would they go ahead and publish information just because the NYT did? The plot is thicker than first thought, imho.


84 posted on 06/30/2006 12:04:35 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( on the cutting edge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

To: Gumlegs; Stultis; BurbankKarl

Don't get me wrong, I put the majority of the blame on this leak to the Slimes. I just also questions the Post's, WSJ etc's decision to also go with the story is also suspect in some ways now that they are coming out against the Slimes.

It's a sad fact that our government was forced to declassify previously classified information, used in the war on terror, because we have an overzealous press.


92 posted on 06/30/2006 12:15:00 PM PDT by Brytani (Someone stole my tagline - reward for its return!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson