What is inaccurate in it?
umm, the freaking title? Op Ed put forth as news? Nothing wrong with that for you? There is for me.
The whole premise is inaccurate. Let's look at this:
"Specter's hearing is about more than the statements. He's been compiling a list of White House practices he bluntly says could amount to abuse of executive power — from warrantless domestic wiretapping program to sending officials to hearings who refuse to answer lawmakers' questions."
First there was no known domestic wiretapping, it all had to do with international communication to suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations. Second, what law requires white house officials to answer whatever question the Senate wishes to ask? Specter is grossly overstating things.