[april15Bendovr]

Anyone catch this today?

[pissant]

Do you have a contact for Mr. Meese? Let's all encourage him to talk to the administration and lend his support for prosecuting the Times.

[Cementjungle]

Unfortunately, no one's about to attempt to even slap the NYT's wrist, much less prosecute them. The NYT probably has dirt on just about every congress critter to insure their silence.

[april15Bendovr]

I heard the interview but I cant remember the gentleman's name from Detroit who covered for Rush. He might be able to contact Ed Meese

[reagan_fanatic]

Blah blah blah - and in the end, nothing will be done. It's just the same old, same old, and the Times knows it.

[Tench_Coxe]

Maybe this is being done all wrong. Perhaps returning soldiers should be shown a list of names of comrades who died, with a disclaimer: " These fellows died as a result of the publishing of these articles by XXX. We feel for your loss, and just thought you should know the factors responsible for their deaths...."

[tobyhill]

Put the Times on the terrorist watch list and declare them as enemy combatants. Using information to aid the enemy means they support the enemy and enemy propagandist are just as lethal as an enemy with a gun.

[Henchster]

We shouldn't be relying on the government to prosecute. It's time for the AMERICAN PEOPLE to stand up to the NY Slimes. An angry mob of pitchforks, tar and feathers ought to do just fine.

Hey Sulzberger and Keller, look out your window:

+ + = REAL JUSTICE for TRAITORS.

[N. Theknow]

They are not giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

They are the enemy.

Their mission is to destroy the President of the United States by any and all means.

[JudgemAll]

The NYT's infliction of harm or choking on soldiers in Iraq will find out that they are well trained to fight while others try to choke them...

This business will be taken care of, and all debts will be paid one way or another.

The NYT might as well either curl up and die or just shoot themselves in the head outright.

[Mogollon]

This is the classic definition of treason going back at least 600 years, to Britain's Treason Act of 1351, which defines high treason, in part as:

"or be adherent to the King’s enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort in the realm..."

Right!. And in those days the punishment was hanging and disembowelment, or maybe it was being drawn and quartered. In any case, either will work fine for the perps.