Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/23/2006 9:03:35 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: presidio9

While anyone who burns the US flag should immediately be deported (obviously they hate America), this is not the issue for our Congress to be wasting time on. The right is pandering to us for failing to do anything else substantial, particularly with immigration.


2 posted on 06/23/2006 9:09:11 AM PDT by ritewingwarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

It is a smoke screen to obscure the federal marriage amendment.


4 posted on 06/23/2006 9:12:10 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
But the Supreme Court ruled in 1989 that as distasteful or offensive as this kind of protest is, it is protected by the First Amendment. A year later, the high court overturned the federal Flag Protection Act.

This author is an idiot. It is PRECISELY BECAUSE of the SCOTUS' ruling that a constitutional amendment is required to overturn their retarded decision. the SCOTUS is NOT the law of the land, the people are.

5 posted on 06/23/2006 9:12:16 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

There is no need for this amendment. Not because the Supremes did something wrong, but because they were right. If someone wants to buy an American flag and burn it on their own property, I can see no reason on Earth why I should have any say in the matter. Now, if it's not their flag, or if it's done in such a fashion as to be a public hazard due to fire, that can be handled by existing laws.


7 posted on 06/23/2006 9:30:41 AM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

We don't need a flag-burning amendment.

I like to know who the idiots and a-holes are. They like to advertize their presence and I like to avoid them at all cost. It's a good arrangement. Let's not mess with it.


8 posted on 06/23/2006 9:30:49 AM PDT by L98Fiero (I'm worth a million in prizes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

It's time to sh!t or get off the pot. There was a time when I was opposed to such an amendment. I've changed my mind in the past few years. This isn't going to cost us anything and it shows the SCOTUS that they DON'T have the final say, we do. Passing this amendment will please a large majority of Americans and the ones who don't like it can just suck it up and move on, just like so many of us have had to do since Roe v. Wade.
This is a way to see everyone's true colors.


13 posted on 06/23/2006 9:45:29 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

In which case are you more likely to be prosecuted?

1. Burning an American flag.
2. Burning a Rainbow flag.


21 posted on 06/23/2006 10:27:37 AM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I upheld our flag, before I burned it with my mouth and my comrades in the Senate in '71. Today all democrats support the burning of the flag. At least that we do not flip-flop on that matter.

/Sarcasm off

26 posted on 06/23/2006 11:06:49 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

I don't like it when people talk on their cell phones on line at the airport. We should get a Constitutional Amendment about it.

/same logic as Flag Amendment


42 posted on 06/23/2006 1:39:11 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson