Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Kim Jong can't even feed his own people so what is his point? Tyrants usually end up hoisted on their own petards - another example of Communism’s promised but failed Utopia – starvation and oppression.
1 posted on 06/18/2006 6:07:58 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yoe

North Korea (read: Kim Jong-il) seeks to bolster Kim Jong-il's position with his own military; no doubt he hopes that lots of weapons, with salary and perks, will keep him safely swilling imported cognac, riding around in chauffeured limosines, and fiddling with dancing girls. It's worked so far - wonder how long the troops will sit still for their friends and relatives among the "common people" being slowly and painfully starved to death.


2 posted on 06/18/2006 6:26:27 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

North Korea is far more dangerous than Iran. Proven rocketry expertise, a totalitarian state of Stalinist reach, famine roaming constantly and a leader of indispouted insanity. Iran is ambitious but rational. Kim is a mad dog.


3 posted on 06/18/2006 7:51:14 AM PDT by Androcles (All your typos are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

What does N Kor have that anybody would want? Nobody would be interested in taking over that cheap piece of real estate except maybe Wahabbis.


4 posted on 06/18/2006 7:54:11 AM PDT by RightWhale (Off touch and out of base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe; All
We must all thank Bill Clinton for his delusional 1994 "Agreed Framework" plan in which he *gave* North Korea two twin, light water nuclear reactors. Clinton called it his 'plan' so that Congress didn't get to vote on it.

All that was required of North Korea was that they sign a piece of paper stating that they wouldn't use the two nuke reactors to make nuclear bombs. North Korea promptly tore up the paperwork /dumped it in the trash and they've been pulling plutonium from the spent fuel rods ever since.

Hence, it was Bill Clinton and the democrats who fully armed North Korea with nuclear bombs."

Now, one poster today might say that is not important whatsoever that Clinton gave N Korea those two nuclear reactors or say that 'this technology' has been around for years - I then say in return, should we then assume it's O.K. for any future President -to give nuclear reactors to Communist or Islamic countries?

How about giving nuclear reactors to Cuba? How about a future President who would give Libya a few nuclear reactors. How about passing out nuclear reactors to Islamic terrorist?

No, the importance today -of pointing out the delusional mindset of Clinton (and the Democrats)
- - - - - - -is in those North Korean 'cooling ponds.'

7 posted on 06/18/2006 10:11:48 AM PDT by Sic Luceat Lux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson