Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/17/2006 2:35:15 PM PDT by MamaDearest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: MamaDearest; prairiebreeze; Mo1

Bump for later read; this looks fascinating.


2 posted on 06/17/2006 2:37:32 PM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

Are they going to make this a cover story on the actual magazine, like they did with their Global Warming scaremongering?


4 posted on 06/17/2006 2:41:25 PM PDT by Question Liberal Authority (Now that Zarqawi is dead, who will the Democrats nominate in 2008?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

It looks fascinating, all right, but a couple of things bother me.

First, It's written by one of the left wingers from Time, Incorporated. So, who knows what axes he has to grind?

Second, I don't want to spend any money on a book that would support the liars at Time and put money into the pockets of their left-wing, treasonous owners.

Third, did the administration approve of these leaks, or is this yet another example of traitors at the CIA leaking sensitive stuff to their left-wing contacts in the media?

Perhaps these suspicions are unjustified, but after the way Time has behaved over the past fifty years and more, I think there are good grounds to be suspicious.


5 posted on 06/17/2006 2:43:05 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

Thanks Time for alerting the terrorist to a cia operative within Al Qaeda....


6 posted on 06/17/2006 2:45:30 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

7 posted on 06/17/2006 2:46:48 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

2003 Flashback:

Preparations for possible attacks gear up

Saturday, February 8, 2003 Posted: 10:37 PM EST (0337 GMT)

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/08/threat.level/

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Transportation security was increased nationwide on Saturday and health care officials were urged to be vigilant for symptoms of bio-chemical contamination, a day after the nation raised its terrorism threat level a notch to "high."

New York City; eastern Virginia; Portland, Oregon; and Atlanta, Georgia -- host of this year's National Basketball Association All-Star Game -- were beefing up security under the alert warning issued Friday. New flight restrictions are planned for airspace around Washington, D.C., starting Monday.

-snip-

Of possible concern could be attacks involving chemicals, such as ricin, cyanide, or organophosphates and/or radiological dispersal devices (RDD), and dirty bombs," a letter from Virginia officials said.


10 posted on 06/17/2006 2:54:37 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

Vote for the Democrat Party (Ha-Ha). They will protect us just as Bill and Hillary Clinton did on 911 (Ha-Ha)!!! Can you imagine any American dumb enough or insane enough to cast a vote for the Democrat "Traitor/Treason" Party? The filth, vermin and scum of humanity that makes up the current Democrat Party would have had massive rejoicing if thousands of New Yorkers were poisened to death in the NYC sybway system. America, you better wake up, and rip the beating heart out the treasonous low life called Democrat by voting them all out of office and into the black hole of evil from whence they all came!!!


11 posted on 06/17/2006 2:57:42 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest
prototype based on the captured design, which comprised two separate chambers for sodium cyanide and a stable source of hydrogen, such as hydrochloric acid. A seal between the two could be broken by a remote trigger, producing the gas for dispersal. The prototype confirmed their worst fears: "In the world of terrorist weaponry," writes Suskind, "this was the equivalent of splitting the atom.

Sounds less than impressive to me. Sodium cyanide plus hydrochloric acid is just the old reliable San Quentin recipe. Drop the cyanide pellets into the acid, plop plop, fizz fizz, smell the apricots, and choke and croak! A subway car could make a serviceable green room, with seating for a few dozen instead of just two, but it escapes me how the "invention" solves the gas distribution problem to enable a larger attack.

16 posted on 06/17/2006 3:50:46 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

I can think of a reason why Zawahiri might have called off the attack.

If the New York subway and other targets were attacked with cyanide, essentially chemical warfare, 45 days after "early 2003", we would have been on the eve of, or at war with Iraq. That would have raised the real possibility of mushroom clouds over RGFC divisions.

Al Qaeda obviously retains the technology though.

I wonder how large an attack it would take for pressure on Musharraf to open the Pak border to US troops?


23 posted on 06/17/2006 4:42:40 PM PDT by jeffers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest
Most good information is through a mole. What a pity now that they jeopardize the life of this mole or moles. Do people always have to announce what they know for the almighty $$$$. Now there will be closer scrutiny from within that group.
25 posted on 06/17/2006 4:54:00 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

bump


28 posted on 06/17/2006 5:20:05 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

If it succeeded in killing 1 Million Libs in NYC it'd certainly be jake with the NYT, no surprise here Hell if it killed a bunch of NYT employees it'd be jake with the NYT. NO SURPRISE!!!!


29 posted on 06/17/2006 5:42:58 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

Suskind is low life piece of garbage.


30 posted on 06/17/2006 6:14:33 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

RON SUSKIND is a Bush Basher . Bush-Bashing Books Due Out Mimicking the lead-up to the 2004 elections, when publishers flooded bookstores with books bashing President Bush, more anti-Bush books are due out this summer – just before Congressional elections.

Two years ago, "Against All Enemies” by former anti-terrorism chief Richard Clark was highly critical of the Bush administration’s counterterrorism efforts, and "The Price of Loyalty” by RON SUSKIND chronicled former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill’s disillusionment with the Bush White House. Both hit the top of the bestseller list.

Now Suskind has another book about to be published, "The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11,” which focuses on U.S. intelligence failures, USA Today reports.

Other forthcoming books include:
# "Oath Betrayed” by Stephen Miles, a medical professor who cites "medical complicity" in "the abuse and neglect" of inmates at U.S. prisons in Iraq, Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.


# "The End of Iraq” by Peter Galbraith, a fellow at the Center for Arms Control. The book’s subtitle is: "How American Incompetence Created a War Without End.”

# "What Terrorists Want” by Louise Richardson, a Harvard lecturer who insists that Bush's war on terror will fail because of an ignorance of history.

# "Is Iraq Another Vietnam?” by Robert Bingham, a Vassar College professor who maintains that U.S. policymakers haven’t learned the lessons of Vietnam.

Bernadette Malone of Sentinel, a conservative imprint, told USA Today that the wave of anti-war books reflects "the insular, liberal mind-set of most New York publishers. They think we're losing the war, that it's hopeless, a fool's errand . . . I, and a lot of other people, disagree."


31 posted on 06/17/2006 6:18:47 PM PDT by BlueJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

Hi MamaDearest.

Now I see exactly how the phrase "continue on the trained Manhattan" fit into the al qaeda scheme of things. The phrase came up many times in jihadi forum translations. This was both before and after the Madrid bombings.

BTW, nice to run into you off TM!


35 posted on 06/17/2006 7:16:16 PM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo (+++ DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS +++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest
Though intelligence gave no clear indication of what might be afoot, some intelligence reports mentioned chemical weapons, pointing toward work at a camp in southern Afghanistan called Derunta.On November 4, 1998, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York unsealed its indictment of Bin Ladin, charging him with conspiracy to attack U.S. defense installations. The indictment also charged that al Qaeda had allied itself with Sudan, Iran, and Hezbollah.The original sealed indictment had added that al Qaeda had “reached an understanding with the government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq.”109 This passage led Clarke, who for years had read intelligence reports on Iraqi-Sudanese cooperation on chemical weapons, to speculate to Berger that a large Iraqi presence at chemical facilities in Khartoum was “probably a direct result of the Iraq–Al Qida agreement.” Clarke added that VX precursor traces found near al Shifa were the “exact formula used by Iraq.”110This language about al Qaeda’s “understanding” with Iraq had been dropped, however, when a superseding indictment was filed in November 1998.
44 posted on 06/17/2006 9:41:01 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

I shudder to think what would have happened if the Dems were in control of the White House conducting policy in their typical "head in the sand" mode.


46 posted on 06/17/2006 9:57:48 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest
Two things about this story don't smell right

1. Since when has the CIA provided credible intel?

2. Why would an attack be called off? Doesn't make sense.
49 posted on 06/17/2006 10:41:49 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest; All
stepping back in time...

DEFENSElink.mil: "INTEL FROM IRAQ RAIDS LEADS TO NEW YORK CITY SECURITY HIKE" by Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service (October 7, 2005)

Transcripts.CNN.com - The Situation Room: "INVESTIGATION OF POSSIBLE NEW YORK SUBWAY ATTACK; STARTING CORRESPONDENCE BY AL QAEDA" (October 7, 2005)

ABClocal.go.com (AP): "NYC COMMUTERS COPE WITH SUBWAY TERROR THREAT NYC Police On Alert" (October 7, 2005)

MICHELLE MALKIN.com - blog: "NYC SUBWAY ALERT" (October 6, 2005)

FOX NEWS.com: New York - "NYC UPS SUBWAY SECURITY AFTER BOMB THREATS" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Authorities stepped up security on the city's mass transit system Thursday after receiving a credible threat that the New York City subway may be the target of a terrorist attack in the coming days.") (October 6, 2005) (Read More...)



WHITEHOUSE.gov - News Release - Office of the Press Secretary: "PRESIDENT DISCUSSES WAR ON TERROR at National Endowment for Democracy Ronald Reagan Building and Intrnational Trade Center, Washington, D.C." (October 6, 2005)

DEFENSElink.mil: Washington - "PRESIDENT URGES MUSLIMS TO DENOUNCE VIOLENT EXTREMISM" by Donna Miles, American Forces Press Service (October 6, 2005)

WASHINGTON TIMES.com: "BUSH HITS 'ISLAMIC RADICALS'" by Bill Sammon (October 7, 2005)

FrontPageMagazine.com: "BUSH DECLARES WAR ON RADICAL ISLAM" by Daniel Pipes (October 11, 2005)


WHITEHOUSE.gov - News Release: "FACT SHEET: PLOTS, CASINGS, AND INFILTRATIONS REFERENCED IN PRESIDENT BUSH'S REMARKS ON THE WAR ON TERROR"  (October 6, 2005)

51 posted on 06/17/2006 11:24:59 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MamaDearest

I've heard over and over again on Fox News this morning that Zwahiri, Al Queda's second in command ordered that the attack be called off "for unknown reasons."

It's pretty simple, really... These people aren't stupid. They know the history of the leftists in this country during wartime. They know how they won the war for the communists in Viet Nam. If there were to be a huge Al Queda attack in the US, especially now that Al Queda is well known to be in Iraq, that would spell the end of the left's chances of losing the war for us. There's no way they would take a chance of uniting much of the country, and forcing the left out of power at this point in time.

They're perfectly aware of the fact that if they bide their time, the left will continue to try to force America to lose the war in Iraq, and even the WOT.

Mark


54 posted on 06/18/2006 8:48:23 AM PDT by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson