Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter Hurts the Cause
The American Thinker ^
| 6 15 06
| J.R. Dunn
Posted on 06/15/2006 10:12:05 AM PDT by Kitten Festival
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-330 next last
To: Kitten Festival
Ann Coulter Hurths the Cuase The twuth hurths...
2
posted on
06/15/2006 10:13:01 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
To: Kitten Festival
3
posted on
06/15/2006 10:13:30 AM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: BibChr
Transmogrified verbigage alert!
4
posted on
06/15/2006 10:13:33 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
To: Kitten Festival
To: Kitten Festival
6
posted on
06/15/2006 10:13:46 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
To: Kitten Festival
Notice anything wrong with the title?
7
posted on
06/15/2006 10:13:53 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
To: dirtboy
8
posted on
06/15/2006 10:13:57 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
To: Kitten Festival
Ann Coulter Hurths the CuaseSplit-lip header?
9
posted on
06/15/2006 10:14:11 AM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: dirtboy
Speaking truth to TIN FOIL HAT WEARING KOOKS ON THE FAR LEFT..
10
posted on
06/15/2006 10:15:14 AM PDT
by
BMC1
(DEMOCRATS AND RINO'S ARE STUCK ON STUPID, MASTERS OF DECEPTION AND CULTURE OF TREASON.)
To: Lazamataz
Shucks...they fixed the title..:(
11
posted on
06/15/2006 10:16:24 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(Army Wife and Army Mother.....toughest job in the military)
To: Kitten Festival
Ann Coulter Hurts the Cause
This is an opinion.
You all know what they say about opinions.
12
posted on
06/15/2006 10:16:38 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(The liberal media has picked sides and they've sided with the Jihadists.)
To: Kitten Festival
And being the silent majority all over again doesn't hurt it?
13
posted on
06/15/2006 10:16:57 AM PDT
by
NRA1995
(Zarqawi died, liberals cried....)
To: BMC1
Speaking truth to TIN FOIL HAT WEARING KOOKS ON THE FAR LEFT..It's twue! It's twue!
14
posted on
06/15/2006 10:17:15 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(When Bush is on the same side as Ted the Swimmer on an issue, you know he's up to no good...)
To: Kitten Festival
Mr. J.R. Dunn has thoroughly missed the point. The liberal practise of annointing victims as unassailable spokes-people. That's what Coulter was highlighting. So what if the Jersey Girls get a bit more fame out of it? It means nothing. What's important is that the process was exposed, the methodology was clearly shown for what it is: just one of many ways the liberals use to stifle free speech.
The victim process works like this:
The liberals advance a phoney argument and it gets criticized, so they dig up a victim (Jersey Girls, Cindy Sheehan, whoever) to advance the argument again and then there is no criticism allowed. What? You're criticizing a VICTIM?
Ann exposed all that. Much more important than whether or not the Jersey Broads get a bit more fame.
To: Kitten Festival
"All conservatives are hereby forbidden from mocking or criticizing any leftists at all, past or present, for fear that the media may quote their comments out of context on a slow news day. I have spoken." - JR Dunn.
To: Kitten Festival
Theyd shot their bolt, they had their fifteen minutes and more, and that was the end of it. Until last week when Ann Coulter, acting unilaterally, put them back on the front pages with an attack so obnoxious that it immediately (and unjustly it was the Girls themselves, after all, who debased their victim status for political purposes) threw all sympathy in their direction. A free ticket to a second act. Not to mention providing Madame Hillary with an opportunity to pose as, of all things, the defender of civility. No, you moron, Ann Coulter did NOT put that tiny portion, that one comment, from her excellent book on the front pages of the newspaper. The MSM, looking for anything sensational that they could hurl at Ann Coulter and the rest of us conservatives cherry-picked that comment and trumped it up to be something that it was not.
Blame the MSM, not Ann. If she hadn't put that in the book, then the MSM would have found something else in the book to sensationalize, to lie about, and to attack conservatives over. In the meantime, Ann's freedom of speech would have been dealt a blow because she may felt she needed to alter her writings in order to prevent the MSM feeding frenzy. Chilling conservative free speech is a really bad idea. The author of this article should know that.
17
posted on
06/15/2006 10:18:26 AM PDT
by
Spiff
("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
To: Kitten Festival
Let me get this straight: Ann Coulter is now synonymous with "incivility."
That's pretty comical, considering that the entire media is awash in pornography, stupidity, and craven idiocy.
The real problem with Coulter is that she's a hundred times more effective than all of the mewling, pissant "republicans" in the world.
18
posted on
06/15/2006 10:19:00 AM PDT
by
Reactionary
(The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
To: Kitten Festival
To: Kitten Festival
Ann Coulter Hurts the Cause
No, she's not.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-330 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson