Posted on 06/15/2006 12:18:08 AM PDT by Mia T
ping
ping
PING
>>Coulter used the 'swipe' when she should have deployed the death blow. It's no surprise, therefore, that there's nary a 'peep' about the rape, the leftist media notwithstanding.
Rather than proposing that missus clinton "have a chat with her husband before accusing others of being 'mean' to women in light of Juanita Broaddrick's charge that Bill Clinton raped her," Coulter should have proposed instead that missus clinton simply look in the mirror.
Juanita Broaddrick accuses bill clinton of rape, but she accuses hillary clinton of aiding and abetting that rape.
Ann Coulter's problem is that she is coy when she should be blunt and blunt when she should be coy.
Let's call a spade a spade.
There are two misogynists in the clinton household.<<
Maybe Ann can remind me.
When was Bill convicted of raping her.
Look at the Duke case.
>> was Bill convicted of raping her.
Look at the Duke case.<<
That is part of what I am talking about .
The difference of the former is that the accuser came forward years later, I believe(like the women who accused Bob Packwood) - what is happening in the latter is happening right now, immediate .
This is an old dead issue, I wish you Bluesky194 and Mia T choose something more current than an alleged incident that ahppened over a dozen years or so ago !
No Bill O'Rilley is a wimp.
No, it was an indictment of the drive-by-media.
The Clintons are endowed by their enablers with certain alienable rights,...rape, perjury and the pursuit of power.
BTTT
Hillary knew early on that she had a guy who was massively photogenic, a brilliant speaker with a photographic memory who was clearly presidential material IF she could keep the lid down on the little problems; hence this lid committee consisting of Terry Lensner and one or two other PI groups in California which have bribed, coerced, and intimidated victims into silence over a 30 year period, and the only person who could plausibly have been in charge of that lid committee over so long a period of time is Hillary. Nobody else has been WITH Slick that long.
The thing which really did it for me reading these kinds of stories was the interview with Elizabeth Grace in the Toronto Sun. Many of the details are entirely similar to Broaddrick's story; Gracen calls the thing a badly considered one-night stand while friends claim she was in hysterics and had clearly been raped. She started getting good acting parts at about the same time.
Slick KKKlinton was the Attorney General of Arkansas at the time and clearly headed towards the governor's mansion. Do you have any idea what might be involved in trying to charge a state AG with rape? I mean, particularly for a woman living in the same state and in the case of an AG known to have zero qualms about killing people who become inconvenient?
Coulter is the real-deal when it comes to exposing the 'Godless' Dems... she's a treasure to have in our ranks. Who has had the guts to stand up and call Rapist42 for what he truly is... other than you... and a slew of us in the conservative forums? NO ONE. Coulter is like conservative holy-water... dabbled on the writhing carcass of the socialist-beast!
It makes me vomit... when members of FreeRepublic whine about her tongue-in-cheek remark on the marital status of the DNC's 'Jersey4'. Taken in context, she was simply throwing out a possibility that no one... other than the four women and their psychiatrists... can confirm or deny.
There was a peep. . .i.e. a very small one, made by Drudge; Ann's 'swiping response' to Hillary actually reported/headlined. So amazed, I responded with her comment on a thread; noting 'as per Drudge' (soon to be my reality check). . .
Upon checking back to Drudge so as to revel a bit in this public framing; found Ann had been 'deleted' and only Swiper Hillary remained - and for days - while Ann's response was no more than a moment in time; at least by Drudge measure.
She was not even respectfully archived. . .but perhaps I just missed the rest of the story. . .
That said, Mia, you are right; the swipe to Hillary, should have been a 'blow'. Clinton truth requires/demands just that. . .otherwise, it is too easy for the 'et als' to just ignore and/or delete.
Meantime, kudos to Ann for 'swiping' Hillary, where it really hurts; and I hope she knocks her bigtime. . .next time. . .
I take it you didn't play the Hannity interview of Broaddrick. If you believe Juanita's charge about the husband, why wouldn't you believe Juanita's charge about the wife? Missus clinton knew about the rape and threatened Juanita. Missus clinton's message was clear: Juanita had better continue to keep her mouth shut about the rape.... or else. That incident occurred three weeks after the rape. Juanita tells Hannity "that was the first time I became afraid of that woman." IMO, that event was the third rape of Juanita by the clintons. (He raped her twice--"twice at the same event," to quote Christopher Shays.) As for contemporaneous evidence that hillary clinton knew about the rape and did everything to quash the victim, the following, although hearsay, comes closest you can get to it:
By the way, the crime of rape usually has no witnesses, It is usually a 'he said, she said' kind of crime. The credibility of the he and the she come into play. And who would ever believe the clintons? But they never denied raping Broaddrick, in any case! Why? Because that would open them up to a civil lawsuit.
Did he rape that woman, Juanita Broaddrick? Most of America--even devout leftists--believed Juanita after the Dateline NBC interview, in November 1999 in which she told us about her rape by clinton. Unfortunately, the airing of the interview came a few months too late. The two rapists had already retaken the White House for another four years.... The course was set. It led, inexorably, to 9/11. Character counts.
|
After Juanita Broaddrick made the accusation in 1999, [Clinton]'s attorney, David Kendall, alone answered, saying any such charges were "absolutely false." Of course, attorney Robert Bennett believed... Clinton when he said he hadn't had sex with Monica Lewinsky and defended the president then on no toss sturdy grounds. Thus while lawyers can spare Mr. Clinton awkward moments at the podium in which he has to say, "I did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky" or "I did not fondle that woman, Kathleen Wlley" or "I did not rape that woman, Mrs. Broaddrick," their comments are, in effect, non-denial denials. Given the silence from the West Wing, Mrs. Broaddrick this week sought answers from Hillary Clinton, whose telescopic feminism apparently sees injustice to women everywhere except the kind which occurs closer to home. In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill." "What did you mean, Hillary?" her letter continued. "Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to keep quiet?" The not-so-subtle implication of the letter is that Mrs. Clinton is, in fact, her husband's enabler. Dealing with her husband's promiscuity and worse might keep her from dealing with the important issues facing the people of New York, namely her candidacy. One might call it a Faustian bargain except that even Mephistopheles might not lower himself to sign such a deal.... |
AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON SUNDAY OCT 15, 2000
As I watched Rick Lazio's interview on Fox News this morning, I felt compelled to write this open letter to you, Mrs. Clinton. Brit Hume asked Mr. Lazio's views regarding you as a person and how he perceived you as a candidate. Rick Lazio did not answer the question, but I know that I can. You know it, too. I have no doubt that you are the same conniving, self-serving person you were twenty-two years ago when I had the misfortune to meet you. When I see you on television, campaigning for the New York senate race, I can see the same hypocrisy in your face that you displayed to me one evening in 1978. You have not changed. I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton's bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering. What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question. Yes, I can answer Brit Hume's question. You are the same Hillary that you were twenty years ago. You are cold, calculating and self-serving. You cannot tolerate the thought that you will soon be without the power you have wielded for the last eight years. Your effort to stay in power will be at the expense of the state of New York. I only hope the voters of New York will wake up in time and realize that Hillary Clinton is not an honorable or an honest person. I will end by asking if you believe the statements I made on NBC Dateline when Lisa Myers asked if I had been assaulted and raped by your husband? Or perhaps, you are like Vice-President Gore and did not see the interview.
|
|
. . .so at the beginning of her going public. . .she started to get acting jobs. . .Publicity - good/bad - always a plus in the business. . .
Or. . . might I assume that you could be implying that perhaps Clinton's Hollywood elitist friends. . .or just a few. . .made sure this woman became gainfully employed. . .and quickly? (Certainly an easier/safer option than /Clinton having to 'knock her off'. . .)
Wonder what she is doing now. . .and where. . .
OR. ..you are saying that it was a fraudulent claim of rape. . .
The question isn't whether Ann Coulter is timid. Of course Ann Coulter isn't timid. The question is, Was she timid in her accusation?
There is no less evidence of missus clinton's revictimization of Broaddrick than there is of bill clinton's double rape of Broaddrick. (See my prior response to you.)
BTW, I am the first to say that by focusing the world's attention on the clinton rape of Broaddrick, Coulter did a great service for us all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.