North American Union to Replace USA?

Human Events ^ | May 19, 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

[Let's Roll]

I see - all you have to do is f*ck up your own country and then force your pathologies and failures onto your wealthier neighbor(s).

And it would be force despite what our elected representatives can be bribed, persuaded, hoodwinked into doing.

[Pippin]

Y'all won't believe this thread!

What a CROCK!

[conservativecorner]

And your point is? I don't care whether you believe it or not. Just because you don't believe something is happening doesn't make it so unless you are God. Otherwise, it's simply your opinion, and we all have them.

[Pippin]

I'm glad we agree we have differing opinions, I'll respect yours if you respect mine.

[Lemondropkid31]

LOL it could always be, but nothing suprises me anymore. It could explain why the government really doesn't seem to want to do anything with the borders. And since the Council of Foreign Relations is slightly left of center, it would not suprise me that they would be doing this.

[conservativecorner]

You bet, and I know there will never be 100% consensus on anything. We agree to disagree.

[ghostrider]

Bush is going to do this all by himself? Where is congress in this diabolical plot? He really has to hurry since he only has two years left in office. Please line up on the left to get fitted for your tinfoil hats...

Of course Bush isn't going to do this all by himself. He, like congress, is nothing more than a figurehead for the financial syndicates (new world royalty) that have bought our political system. The process has been slowly evolving for decades. Ronald Reagan was very distrustful of the Bush machine. Ross Perot tried to warn us of its dangers. The clintons and the Bushes seem to be responding to the same core world agenda, while distracting us with the hate issues of abortion and homosexuality. Please line up with your head in the ground and look for security and ignore the reality that is biting you in the rear.

[snugs]

Which is why Britain should have made EFTA strong and never joined the EU

[CaptainCanada]

I'm with you. A Canada/USA link-up would be a good match-up as the culture
lingusitic, socio-economic structures and levels are comparable.
Mexico is on a different level from a socio-ecomonic perspective and
its integration into a union would be problematic.
Quebec is also an obvious issue and could be cut loose and become a home
for all cultures (Islamists as and example) who feel "uncomfortable"
in a western style democracy and culture.

[MizSterious]

Well, this might explain why our local grocery store was out of aluminum foil yesterday. Takes a lot of tinfoil to follow some of these topics.

[Pippin]

Thanks :o)

[Pippin]

I'm willing to keep an open mind on this

[conservativecorner]

But wasn't it the French speakers who recently put the conservatives in power in Canada?

[Lemondropkid31]

Me too. We will just have to see what happens.

[Fruitbat]

Well, this might explain why our local grocery store was out of aluminum foil yesterday. Takes a lot of tinfoil to follow some of these topics.

Yeah, well when logical and sound reasons are about as sparse as truth in Hillary Clinton's speeches, then yeah, "aluminum foil" is bound to be a big seller, eh!

[La Enchiladita]

Corsi just makes this stuff up.

Really? Would you say the same of Unfit For Command?

[Rodney King]

No.

[La Enchiladita]

I'm willing to keep an open mind on this

Well, that was a change over "not believing one word." We would all rather that it is not true. Sadly, there are too many developments that point in the direction of a homogenized North America. In particular, there appears to be zeal on the part of Bush family to Latinize our Nation. To wit, the following speech:

"Century of the Americas" Speech, Candidate George W. Bush, August 25, 2000

In addition, here is a quote from the President's speech + press conference in Omaha, Nebraska, yesterday:

When I get back to Washington I'm going to sign an executive order creating a task force on the new Americas.

[jmc813]

EXCELLENT point! If this behavior had been during Clinton's term, the same people, largely the Bushbots, would have been raging the same as those of us opposed to Bush's immigration/bordercontrol/domestic security policies, agenda, and opinions.

Cognitive dissonance is a powerful force.

[Pippin]

When I posted that about not believing what was written on this thread was said in shock.

I'll have to look into this, thanks for the link.