Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter calls 9/11 widows "witches" (Lying Headline from Reuters)
Reuters via Yahoo! News ^ | June 7, 2006 | Claudia Parsons

Posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:37 PM PDT by new yorker 77

Conservative author Ann Coulter sparked a storm on Wednesday after describing a group of September 11 widows who backed the Democratic Party as millionaire "witches" reveling in their status as celebrities.

"I've never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much," Coulter writes in her book "Godless: The Church of Liberalism," published on Tuesday, referring to four women who headed a campaign that resulted in the creation of the September 11 Commission that investigated the hijacked plane attacks.

Coulter wrote that the women were millionaires as a result of compensation settlements and were "reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis."

A spokeswoman for publisher Crown Forum said it had set a first print run of 1 million copies of "Godless" and there were 1.5 million copies of Coulter's previous four books in print.

The four women, Kristen Breitweiser, Patty Casazza, Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie Van Auken, declined to discuss the book in detail but issued a statement saying they had been slandered.

"There was no joy in watching men that we loved burn alive. There was no happiness in telling our children that their fathers were never coming home again," said the statement signed by the four, along with a fifth woman, Monica Gabrielle.

The four women, who live in or around East Brunswick, New Jersey, became friends after September 11 and formed a group that agitated for the investigation. "Our only motivation ever was to make our nation safer," they said.

Coulter, whose books include the bestseller "How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)," argues in the new book the women she dubs "the Witches of East Brunswick" wanted to blame President George W. Bush for not preventing the attacks.

She criticized them for making a campaign advertisement for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry in 2004, and added: "By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."

PERSONAL ATTACKS

Asked by Reuters why she made such personal comments, Coulter said by e-mail, "I am tired of victims being used as billboards for untenable liberal political beliefs."

"A lot of Americans have been seething over the inanities of these professional victims for some time," she added.

Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg (news, bio, voting record) of New Jersey said Coulter's "shameless attack" on the widows sparked disgust. "Her bookselling antics and accompanying vulgarity deserve our deepest contempt," he said in a statement.

The New York Post, owned by Rupert Murdoch's News. Corp., slammed the comments in an article on Wednesday headlined: "Righty writer Coulter hurls nasty gibes at 9/11 gals."

Coulter, a regular television commentator who is hugely popular among some conservatives, was challenged on NBC's "Today" show on Tuesday over what host Matt Lauer called "dramatic" remarks, prompting her to say, "You are getting testy with me."

Coulter is known for a combative column after September 11 saying, "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." In one book, she wrote, "Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do."

Her latest comments were quoted on radio stations in New York on Wednesday and the book was the subject of debate on Web sites such as www.salon.com. The Daily News newspaper's front-page headline was "Coulter the Cruel."

The controversy appeared to be doing no harm to sales of Coulter's latest book, which was listed as the second-best seller of the day at online retailer Amazon.com on Wednesday afternoon.

Copyright © 2006 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Copyright © 2006 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; coulter; godless; ladyann; widows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-602 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2006 4:51:39 PM PDT by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Coulter was commenting on the four Jersey girls who used their husband's deaths as a backstage pass to Bush bash via the MSM.
2 posted on 06/07/2006 4:52:45 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
"By the way, how do we know their husbands weren't planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they'd better hurry up and appear in Playboy."

No class.

3 posted on 06/07/2006 4:53:20 PM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Jersey girls get what they deserve.


4 posted on 06/07/2006 4:53:39 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

That's called "book selling controversy" but I agree it is classless.


5 posted on 06/07/2006 4:55:38 PM PDT by rattrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Yes, it's much classier to lie and try to represent the majority of 9/11 family members.

Coulter went easy on these four.


6 posted on 06/07/2006 4:55:38 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
"No class."

Were you prefer a Hallmark Card?

7 posted on 06/07/2006 4:57:14 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
That's a complete lie. The word she used started with a "b."

(Sorry, couldn't resist.)

8 posted on 06/07/2006 4:57:20 PM PDT by Buggman (L'chaim b'Yeshua HaMashiach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buggman

I prefer to side with the widows who chose not to use their husband's deaths to become political hack media whores.


9 posted on 06/07/2006 4:57:57 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
I noticed that my Senator Lautenberg also made a very strong statement with regard to Mr. Hevesi saying that Senator Schumer would shoot the President between the eyes if he thought he could get away with that.

And I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

10 posted on 06/07/2006 4:58:25 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Talk about a Hit Piece on Ann!!!!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

So these "witches" have 'Absolute Moral Authority'???? Were they the only 4 people who lost loved ones? Then why are they always the only ones highlighted by the Media??? HMmmmm????

11 posted on 06/07/2006 4:58:27 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: satchmodog9

Actually, Frank Lautenberg deserves our "deepest contempt."


12 posted on 06/07/2006 4:58:31 PM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
I didn't take long for the latest libby mediot meme to appear. It's uncanny how they're all on the same page, ain't it?

Yeah. The DNC and the nitwits who write for newspapers obviously have yet again struck on the same narrative quite, you know, by *accident*.

13 posted on 06/07/2006 4:58:56 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Over the top remarks by Coulter, as usual.


14 posted on 06/07/2006 4:59:14 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
There are professional victims. They make a good living off being pitied. Its a miserable way to live, no matter how money you're rolling in. Do you want to be in a freak show the rest of your life? Fame is so overrated.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

15 posted on 06/07/2006 5:00:47 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

It's hard to go over a heaping pile of MSM dung.


16 posted on 06/07/2006 5:00:53 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Fenton Communications.


17 posted on 06/07/2006 5:01:20 PM PDT by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

I agree with you. Tacky as hell.

Coulter is over the top sometimes, and this is a prime example.


18 posted on 06/07/2006 5:01:28 PM PDT by KJC1 (Ant overboard! Hammerhead shark feeding frenzy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
If the Laut were on fire I wouldn't even waste my urine to put out the flames.
19 posted on 06/07/2006 5:01:47 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

You put yourself in the arena, expect to be bloodied. These bimbos put themselves into the political arena, capitalizing on their claim to fame as widows, pretending to speak for all widows of 9-11. they deserve the scorn they get for being professional victims and idiots.


20 posted on 06/07/2006 5:02:19 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 601-602 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson