This same-sex marriage "debate" is all about emotions and not facts. If you want facts look up your own studies, I am not going to do your homework for you. All you have to "see" is the foreign countries who have legalized same-sex marriage and what has happened. Bill O'Reilly had a show this week interviewing someone about just how traditional marriage has suffered from same sex marriage.(meaning hetrosexual couples are not getting married any more) There are many facts and figures to support this claim but just eye witnessing what is going on in our society should give you a clue. I have been warned by others in this venue not to argue with a liberal and you are a case in point. Have a nice untroubled life.
Do you believe a constitutional amendment is warranted based solely on emotions?
If you want facts look up your own studies, I am not going to do your homework for you.
Actually I have, and would be happy to provide them to you in support of my points if you would like. I was simply asking you if you had any support for the various statements you made. That is simply asking you if you had done your homework.
All you have to "see" is the foreign countries who have legalized same-sex marriage and what has happened.
What has happened? Let's look at Massachusetts which has conducted 6000 in about a two year period. Please tell me how that has harmed one single heterosexual marriage. If you cannot, then what is the concern?
Bill O'Reilly had a show this week interviewing someone about just how traditional marriage has suffered from same sex marriage.(meaning hetrosexual couples are not getting married any more)
Are you confusing cause with correlation. For example there are 10 million unmarried couples living together in the US. It has been like that since well before Massachusetts. Are you suggesting that somehow Massachusetts is to blame?
There are many facts and figures to support this claim but just eye witnessing what is going on in our society should give you a clue.
Again, show one solid piece of evidence that any heterosexual marriages have either ended or failed to begin as a result of Massachusetts.
I have been warned by others in this venue not to argue with a liberal and you are a case in point. Have a nice untroubled life.
So once again, you can only resort to the ad hominem attack. If you can't refute what someone says, he must be a liberal. I will expand that advice someone gave you. Never argue or debate with anyone you fear may actually ask you to support your postition. Doesn't matter if it's a liberal or a conservative. Again, you take care.