To: Jeff Fuller
2 posted on
06/06/2006 1:54:58 AM PDT by
jamesm113
To: Jeff Fuller
Governor Romney stands head an shoulders among GOP presidential frontrunners on this issue and could provide the true leadership that is necessary to get the MPA through on the next time around. If Romney sticks by this, it will be a first. He always buckles.
3 posted on
06/06/2006 2:19:34 AM PDT by
maryz
To: Jeff Fuller
Attaching the word marriage to the association of same-sex individuals mistakenly presumes that marriage is principally a matter of adult benefits and adult rights. In fact, marriage is principally about the nurturing and development of children. And the successful development of children is critical to the preservation and success of our nation.
Right on the money.
I would add "procreation," but that might be in there.
4 posted on
06/06/2006 2:23:28 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
To: Jeff Fuller
"While the GOP glitterocracy attended the first gay wedding of one of their own"
What is that referring to?
6 posted on
06/06/2006 2:52:44 AM PDT by
catholicfreeper
(Proud supporter of Pres. Bush and the Gop-- with no caveats, qualifiers, or bitc*en)
To: Jeff Fuller
"But the debate over same-sex marriage is not a debate over tolerance. It is a debate about the purpose of the institution of marriage.
Attaching the word marriage to the association of same-sex individuals mistakenly presumes that marriage is principally a matter of adult benefits and adult rights. In fact, marriage is principally about the nurturing and development of children. And the successful development of children is critical to the preservation and success of our nation."
This should be in big bold letters....maybe tattooed on the behinds of people like Harry Reid who insist its legalizing "pwejoodice".
Hey, if its a state's issue, like the naysayers are saying, pass the ammendment and let the states decide.
8 posted on
06/06/2006 3:05:51 AM PDT by
Adder
(Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
To: Jeff Fuller
Well, even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while.
10 posted on
06/06/2006 3:51:11 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Jeff Fuller
Bumpersticker:
Sodomy is NOT a family value.
To: Jeff Fuller
Nice try, Mitt.
But, if memory serves, your record as the governor of Massachusetts reveals you're anything but conservative.
You can try to move to the right for a presidential run, but it won't work. Iowa Republicans won't be fooled.
16 posted on
06/06/2006 6:29:49 AM PDT by
newgeezer
(Repeal all Amendments after XV. Yes, ALL of them. Yes, I mean that one, too.)
To: Jeff Fuller; AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!
If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!
To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.
Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Romney? - Now, this I would say may be the closest thing I have seen to approaching pandering... LOL
Note: I stated closest, not actual. Comments?
23 posted on
06/06/2006 10:56:46 AM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
To: Jeff Fuller
The GOP is in big trouble, if this is what they think the voters want.
They are in trouble because they have lost the 'Contract with America' political conservatives who gave Rs the majority in the first place. The folks who want govt accountability, smaller govt, strong defense and border security, etc.
The whole problem is, the R party has become 'Socially conservative, politically liberal'.
Like this issue.
Lower spending? Nope. Strong border security? Nope. Social engineering to discriminate against people we don't like?
Yep.
This issue is chasing the political Cs away even faster. Yet these idiots are convinced it's what will give them support.
*Sigh*.
I can't vote R this fall, now. After immigration and now this???
The party I voted for in '94 has become the party I voted *against* in '94.
25 posted on
06/06/2006 11:00:54 AM PDT by
Dominic Harr
(Conservative = Careful, as in 'Conservative with money')
To: Jeff Fuller
Marriage is about kids.. the husband and wife are meaningless.. Queers can't have kids.. except by adopting kids of non queers.. unless a queer marrys a non queer and has some kids..
Being a queer is about sex not about kids.. sometimes queering is about haveing sex WITH kids.. Queer marriage is about insurance..
34 posted on
06/06/2006 11:42:22 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson