To: llevrok
More
Mr. Kerry has signed forms authorizing the Navy to release his record — something he resisted during the campaign — and hired a researcher to comb the naval archives in Washington for records that could pinpoint his whereabouts during dates of the incidents in dispute. Another former crewmember has spent days at a time interviewing veterans to reconstruct every incident in question.
Then what is the hold up?
18 posted on
05/27/2006 10:30:19 AM PDT by
don-o
To: don-o
I think I remember reading that he had only released the records to the Washington Post, which in turn, promised not to print anything they discovered.
26 posted on
05/27/2006 10:33:05 AM PDT by
MarkeyD
(Make Love, Not Cartoons. I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: don-o
Mr. Kerry has signed forms authorizing the Navy to release his record — something he resisted during the campaign — and hired a researcher to comb the naval archives in Washington for records that could pinpoint his whereabouts during dates of the incidents in dispute. Another former crewmember has spent days at a time interviewing veterans to reconstruct every incident in question.
Then what is the hold up? He only authorized release to his pet writer, not to the general public, not even to the news media in general.
40 posted on
05/27/2006 10:37:42 AM PDT by
El Gato
To: don-o
I think that the release he signed was limited to what he's already released and nothing more.
To: don-o
Mr. Kerry has signed forms authorizing the Navy to release his record SIGNED but never SENT.
161 posted on
05/27/2006 11:49:14 AM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: don-o
The NYT conveniently fails to inform that the release was for a specific person and not the public in general.
321 posted on
05/28/2006 5:08:52 AM PDT by
Jimmy Valentine's brother
(Crush Code Pink, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of the womyn)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson