1 posted on
05/25/2006 9:19:05 PM PDT by
SandRat
To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
2 posted on
05/25/2006 9:19:32 PM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
"The data stolen from the employees' home contained the names and birth dates of 26.5 million veterans and some spouses, as well as Social Security numbers for 19.6 million veterans, he told the committee today."Those 3 identifiers are all that's needed for identity theft. Anyone one of these people are wide open for exploitation. My father, who is a Viet Nam vet is undoubtedly on this list.
4 posted on
05/25/2006 9:25:59 PM PDT by
KoRn
To: SandRat
The employee has been placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of a full-scale investigation, Nicholson said. What a joke, the govt. worker will get a slap on the wrist...if that.
Hell, he'll probably receive a promotion.
5 posted on
05/25/2006 9:27:45 PM PDT by
CrawDaddyCA
(Free Travis McGee!!)
To: SandRat
I wanna see some heads roll!
To: SandRat
8 posted on
05/25/2006 9:42:48 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: SandRat
Bookmarking.
Damn stupid fool %$#*&&^@! government agents!!!
11 posted on
05/25/2006 9:57:26 PM PDT by
Palladin
("Governor Lynn Swann."...it has a nice ring to it!)
To: SandRat
HOW could this happen today, and why would a person take this information home, unless they were intending to tamper with it to begin with?I think this investigation will probably focus on the theft and not why this employee took the data home to begin with.
12 posted on
05/25/2006 10:35:55 PM PDT by
Shery
(in APO Land)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson