Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

International Law Threatens Home Schooling Warns Home School Legal Defense
LifeSiteNews ^ | 5/25/06 | Terry Vanderheyden

Posted on 05/25/2006 4:09:21 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
This "silver lining" in all of this is the United Nations' utter inability to enforce their anti-Americanism.
1 posted on 05/25/2006 4:09:24 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger; Tired of Taxes

Home School Ping.


2 posted on 05/25/2006 4:09:54 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Does this suck or what!

Get the US out of the UN, and the UN out of the US. And while we're at it, get rid of activist judges!

3 posted on 05/25/2006 4:12:08 PM PDT by basil (Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Why should they when they can get American Courts to do it for them.

Laws will be the death of us yet.


4 posted on 05/25/2006 4:12:37 PM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

5 posted on 05/25/2006 4:20:00 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Botulism: Doing the same thing over and over and over, yet expecting a different outcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Under the Convention, severe limitations are placed on a parent's right to direct and train their children."

"Farris explains that, in 1995, "the United Kingdom was deemed out of compliance" with the Convention "because it allowed parents to remove their children from public school sex-education classes without consulting the child". Farris argues that, "by the same reasoning, parents would be denied the ability to homeschool their children unless the government first talked with their children and the government decided what was best. This committee would even have the right to determine what religious teaching, if any, served the child's best interest." H I L L A R Y C A R E!!!

6 posted on 05/25/2006 4:20:35 PM PDT by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

We need National Burn a UN Flag day. And Ted Turner flies one above his penthouse in Atlanta too, what a loser.


7 posted on 05/25/2006 4:24:17 PM PDT by King Moonracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Oh yeah?!!!
8 posted on 05/25/2006 4:26:48 PM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I have long been an advocate for a Constitutional amendment that:

1) states that no treaty or international agreement supersedes the Constitution of the United States

2) and were a conflict between a ratified US Law and an international agreement exists, the SCOTUS shall be the final judge of what provisions in part or in whole shall remain in effect as the equal to US Law.

3) No treaty or international law or convention that the United States is not a current member or signatory to, shall be binding on any citizen of the United States or any person under the US jurisdiction
9 posted on 05/25/2006 4:33:23 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

No new constitutional amendment is necessary. The Consttution already states that the supreme law of the land is the Constitutional and laws made pursuant to it. Any interpretation to the contrary is therefore illegitimate, and is a usurpation.

Judges who rule in favor of "international law" and aginst our constitutional rights should be impeached or otherwise removed from office (as by whatever legal procedures are in place in the states for removing corrupt or incompetant judges).

It is a mistake in the long run to think that we can write into the Constitution safeguards which will grant us immunity against judicial usurpation. The safeguards are already there. What is needed is the political will to protect our rights.

Rights must be defended, and exercised, and taught, or they will be lost. A culture which decays will lose the love of its traditional liberties, and the rights which we consider part of our culture will disappear.


10 posted on 05/25/2006 4:49:04 PM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: docbnj; Lucky Dog
It is a mistake in the long run to think that we can write into the Constitution safeguards which will grant us immunity against judicial usurpation. The safeguards are already there. What is needed is the political will to protect our rights.

Rights must be defended, and exercised, and taught, or they will be lost. A culture which decays will lose the love of its traditional liberties, and the rights which we consider part of our culture will disappear.

We need both respect for the Law and the libertarian will to elect representatives who will exercise sovereignty.

Disrespect wrongful authority - then overthrow it.

11 posted on 05/25/2006 4:55:38 PM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: docbnj

Treaties ratified by the proceedures specified in the Constitution have the force of law. If we have not ratified some of these international treaties, they are not legally significant in our country.

Furthermore, we should not ratify most of those grand-sounding international codes, because they are the wosrt sort of law: they are vague, general, and applicable by almost any actions of a dictator. That is why it is very important that the public understand that good intentions count for little in framing law. Mush of the bad law in New Jersey comes from vague, sentimental wishes in out lousy state constitution, which give free reign for judges to impliment any rule they themselves think appropriate. For example, there is no reason whatsoever that a state constitution should say anything like "every child shall be given a thorogh education," when no one can define what "thorough" means. Many (if not most) of our state constitutions have gaping openings like that, which were appealing to an idealistic but somewhat stupid public; and the public pays for such mistakes almost without limit.

Let my native state (NJ) be an example: we have the worst supreme court, the most corrupt politics, and (considering our material wealth) one of the worst public education systems in the country. Our onerous tax system drives retirees out of the state, which breaks up families across generations. Our urban crime rate is exceeded only is a few places (such as Detroit or Atlanta or DC). We have no recourse to refendendum and recall, as in some Western states. Learn from the example of NJ, and beware!


12 posted on 05/25/2006 5:04:34 PM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Congress could pass an amendment to the Constitution, stating explicitly that no provision of any international agreement can supersede the constitutional rights of an American citizen.

The unspoken right to educate your own child as you see fit is already there--Amendment IX. All it takes is some Federal Judge, even with an amendment which explicitely enumerates the right, to circumvent it. Look at the 2nd Amendment.

Any judge which uses this Convention, or any other excuse, to supercede our God given right to educate our own children ought to be "chastised."

13 posted on 05/25/2006 5:08:00 PM PDT by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting

Yes!


14 posted on 05/25/2006 5:10:56 PM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
This "silver lining" in all of this is the United Nations' utter inability to enforce their anti-Americanism.

I wish I shared your trust in our government. Watching our Senate sell us down the river today with our President's blessings, makes me lose faith that we can trust ANY of the elitist SOB's any more. They made sure Bush's globalization plan surged ahead, and THAT definitely involves his love for his precious UN.

15 posted on 05/25/2006 5:14:38 PM PDT by NRA2BFree (CONGRESS, YOU BUILD THE FENCE NOW, OR WE*LL VOTE FOR LAWMAKERS WHO WILL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

ping


16 posted on 05/25/2006 5:30:43 PM PDT by Nightshift (Faith is something everyone has. The question is faith in what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

getting the USA out of the UN will not change the minds of these judges.

You have to take over the law schools and the STATE BAR associations. You literally have to remove the communists from the legal profession and thus out of the potential judges pool.


17 posted on 05/25/2006 5:53:17 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Third, the specific threat to parental rights can be solved by putting a clear parents' rights amendment into the black and white text of the United States Constitution."

But the man hating, no-fault divorce and cohabitation industry will oppose that. Its members are in leadership in every other kind of organization and lobby.
18 posted on 05/25/2006 6:48:30 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agrace; bboop; cgk; Conservativehomeschoolmama; cyborg; cyclotic; dawn53; Diva Betsy Ross; ...

HOMESCHOOL PING!


19 posted on 05/25/2006 7:14:14 PM PDT by Tired of Taxes (That's taxes, not Texas. I have no beef with TX. NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson