Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zbigreddogz
The SC hasn't ruled if the full faith and credit clause overrides the DOMA.

There is more to just the “full faith and credit” part of that section...

Pay attention to the words in red:

Article. IV.

Section. 1. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

This is just the trouble with a lot of these issues... nobody bothers to read the whole thing...

The court has no jurisdiction, it is a Constitutional function of Congress, not the courts...

Now, I do favor a strict wording (also to exclude civil unions, domestic partners, etc., etc., ad nausea) as a Constitutional Amendment.

49 posted on 05/25/2006 6:11:55 PM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Yes, in other words, DOMA, which congress did pass.

This would seem to say that the court will rule that it is Constitutional, and thus, a Constitutional amendment is not necessary.


51 posted on 05/25/2006 7:35:30 PM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson