[Bob J]

""In California, adoptions are founded on the consent of birth parents. ... Sharon consented," Annette's lawyers stated."

It appears that consent has been withdrawn.

[Jaded]

If it were a man that hit his "straight partner" this would have been finished long ago. Only on the Left Coast.

[Froufrou]

For some reason, I find this really kind of revolting. Does anyone care about the children? Or are they too busy with their lover's spat to do anything more than use them as pawns?

These people are too immature themselves to be raising children, IMHO.

[RexBeach]

If they were straight would their full names be used in reporting on the case before the Court?

[longtermmemmory]

so now it goes back and is litigated based on the consent.


This is another reason to not allow mere sex partner adoptions.

ALL: remember this adoption standing is just based on the recreational sex between these two women. period.

[DBeers]

Homosexual Agenda Ping!

If you oppose the homosexualization of society
-add yourself to the ping list!

To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.

Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search [ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

More on the homosexual adoption issue RE: the Supreme Court did not get involved in a case...

[newzjunkey]

Though she signed the form in 1999, I'd like to know when she changed her mind due to the alleged abuse. That would make a difference to me. If it hadn't been finalized, then I say she should be able to withdrawal consent.

[Zechariah_8_13]

Sharon argued that her constitutional rights would be violated if an unrelated person were allowed to adopt her child over her objections.

A few yrs ago, she would have argued that her constitutional rights were being violated if her "girlfriend" WASN'T allowed to adopt her child.