Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election Results: Nagin(D) - 52% - 59,460 vs. Landrieu(D) - 48% - 54,131
The New Orleans Times-Picayune ^ | May 21, 2006

Posted on 05/21/2006 9:42:41 AM PDT by new yorker 77

MAYOR OF NEW ORLEANS 442 of 442 precincts reporting

Candidate Number of votes Percentage of votes

Mitch Landrieu (D) - 54,131 - 48%

Ray Nagin (D) - 59,460 - 52%

(Excerpt) Read more at nola.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mitchlandrieu; nagind; neworleans; nomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Notice how this paper had Landrieu listed above Nagin.

Didn't think Nagin would come in on top.

1 posted on 05/21/2006 9:42:42 AM PDT by new yorker 77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Basically a race with no winner. Just losers.


2 posted on 05/21/2006 9:44:24 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Maybe because Nagin is the home team and has last ups.


3 posted on 05/21/2006 9:47:42 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Hey Nawlins! Got Milk! I guess not.


4 posted on 05/21/2006 9:49:06 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (America! Where Bush or "global warming" is blamed for EVERYTHING bad that happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Stupid is as Stupid does..


5 posted on 05/21/2006 9:53:35 AM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Notice how this paper had Landrieu listed above Nagin. Didn't think Nagin would come in on top.

Ah yes, the evil liberal bias of ALPHABETIZATION.

6 posted on 05/21/2006 9:56:13 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
The Landrieu political crime family must have a plan B with all those Federal funds floating around. Could Mitch or Mary be planning to run against Blanco?
7 posted on 05/21/2006 9:58:47 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Nagin owes his reelection to white voters who unexpectedly supported him. I think it was because they didn't want the Landrieu clan taking over the state.


8 posted on 05/21/2006 10:03:01 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Nagin owes his reelection to white voters who unexpectedly supported him. I think it was because they didn't want the Landrieu clan taking over the state.




Now, I'm somewhat "confused," how can the election be between two democRATS?
No Republicans running in this race??
Hmmmm???
9 posted on 05/21/2006 10:10:34 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: danamco

This is a run-off.

All the Republicans were eliminated in the general election, pre-runoff.

Amazing Nagin pulled this off. It's too bad Landrieu came in second in the general since I think anyone else could have knocked him off. Pity.

D


10 posted on 05/21/2006 10:25:30 AM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
Quick beer run for the Nagin victory party.


11 posted on 05/21/2006 10:44:40 AM PDT by Vasilli22 (http://www.richardfest.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Unbelievable!! Lousyiana politics is so bad that even the losers remaining in Nagin's "Chocolate City" can't find anyone better than the most incompetent, idiotic, unstable mayor in America (and, possibly, the world).

Just remember, Nawlins, you elected him. Don't come crying to the rest of us the next time you need to be bailed out.


12 posted on 05/21/2006 10:49:15 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
Just remember, Nawlins, you elected him. Don't come crying to the rest of us the next time you need to be bailed out.




He MUST have been able to get all the submerged school buses up running, bringing his voters to the polls!??!
Remember, THAT is much more important to him than getting them out of nawlins before the Katrina warnings!!!
Hmmmm???
13 posted on 05/21/2006 10:59:39 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: danamco
". . . Now, I'm somewhat "confused," how can the election be between two democRATS? No Republicans running in this race?? Hmmmm???"

We have an "open primary" system here in Louisiana, in which all candidates for any particular office run against each other, regardless of their party affiliation. In the event that no candidate gets a majority of the vote in that first go-round, the top two square off in a run-off.

This is not the first time two Democrats have faced each other in a runoff either. And there have even been a few instances in which two Republicans have squared off in elections for lower-level offices.

The "open primary" system was implemented in the 1970's when the Democratic Party establishment recognized that Republicans were growing in strength and they decided to try to forestall this trend by denying Republicans an "automatic" spot in a run-off. The system has worked to the advantage of Democrats ever since, but there is at least some argument that it has helped to shorten the campaign season and reduce costs. But my response to that is this; reducing the number of voting instances in a campaign from a maximum of three to two only limits the number of times the Democrats have to buy votes.

Needless to say; I oppose the "open primary" system. But then I oppose a lot of what constitutes the way things are run in my benighted state.

Pray for Louisiana everyone! Please!
14 posted on 05/21/2006 11:55:03 AM PDT by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

The last shred of sympathy for NOLA has disappeared here.


15 posted on 05/21/2006 12:08:29 PM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment
". . . Unbelievable!! Lousyiana politics is so bad that even the losers remaining in Nagin's "Chocolate City" can't find anyone better than the most incompetent, idiotic, unstable mayor in America (and, possibly, the world). . . ."

I have no argument with your appraisal of Nagin DustyMoment, but if I were a voting resident of New Orleans -- I live in Lafayette, Louisiana, about 175 miles to the west -- I would have had to hold my nose, reach for the Nagin lever, close my eyes and pull it.

The Landrieu family has done more to institutionalize electoral fraud in Louisiana than anyone since Huey Long.

Pop up the following page to read about Mary Landrieu's initial election to the U.S. Senate in 1996 to see what I mean:

Fraud in the Woody Jenkins vs. Mary Landrieu Election, Nov. 1996

And the official returns (check out Orleans Parish):

Official Statewide Returns, Louisiana Senate Race, Nov. 1996

As bad as Nagin is, I would have had to vote for him were I a resident of New Orleans. The Landrieus are a terrible influence in Louisiana politics.
16 posted on 05/21/2006 12:13:06 PM PDT by StJacques
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Right on.


17 posted on 05/21/2006 12:15:40 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Notice how this paper had Landrieu listed above Nagin.



L comes before N doesn't it?

http://www.sos.louisiana.gov:8090/cgibin/?rqstyp=elcmpct&rqsdta=0520062431750236
Precinct by precinct results.....


18 posted on 05/21/2006 12:21:46 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Nagin owes his reelection to white voters who unexpectedly supported him. I think it was because they didn't want the Landrieu clan taking over the state.



He lost support among the white vote this time but still got enough to win [20% or so].


19 posted on 05/21/2006 12:26:01 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
My big question:

Shouldn't the hundreds (or more) evacuees who boarded buses in Houston yesterday morning for their little trip to the polls (round-trip, BTW) now be required to return to N.O. to enjoy the fruits of their votes??

20 posted on 05/21/2006 12:51:07 PM PDT by TheGrimReaper (Mary Jo Kopechne was unavailable for comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson