Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2006 1:35:55 PM PDT by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: bitt

He voted to be OFF the fence before he voted to be ON the fence...


2 posted on 05/20/2006 1:37:28 PM PDT by TommyDale (North Carolina looks forward to the disbarring of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zacs Mom; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; potlatch; ntnychik; Smartass; Boazo; Alamo-Girl; devolve; ...

LT ping!

been underground, but pop up for the good ones...


3 posted on 05/20/2006 1:38:03 PM PDT by bitt ("guests, particularly uninvited ones, are not in a position to make demands...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
"I was for the fence before I was against it."

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

4 posted on 05/20/2006 1:38:33 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Translated -- Testing the waters before starting the first leg of his Flip-Flop Tour 2006 (Immigration Edition).
5 posted on 05/20/2006 1:38:42 PM PDT by msnimje (Illegals to US CITIZENS .... "You Suck.......Now pass the mash potatoes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

"Equivocation is my position" - John Kerry


6 posted on 05/20/2006 1:41:06 PM PDT by LA Conservative (Al Gore in 2008 - The gift that keeps on giving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

On a side note separate from Kerry's usual ramblings...

I think the 370 mile fence we talked about was not a good idea.

Why?

Because it was only 370 miles?!

Illegal aliens will continue to cross our southern border until we seal it off completely.

370 miles worth of construction is, at best, a band-aid. Some will say that 370 miles is better than nothing - and I agree.

But we needed to go much further than 370 miles.


7 posted on 05/20/2006 1:42:05 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

He voted for it for his self defence, not for the DeFence of this country


8 posted on 05/20/2006 1:42:09 PM PDT by zipp_city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

10 posted on 05/20/2006 1:43:35 PM PDT by Petronski (I just love that woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
I cant believe Kerry is still getting any press.He simply cant make decisions.
11 posted on 05/20/2006 1:43:56 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), fresh from the ongoing Senate debate over an immigration bill, offered the following explanation of his vote in favor of 370 miles of fence at the U.S.-Mexican border (estimated cost $3 million a mile) at yesterday’s New England Council breakfast:

May I be so bold as to offer a statement on behalf of the losing runner for the Presidency?

Life is good, could be better and it could be worse.

With your demise when running for the Presidential office, it is seen and felt as better Mr. Kerry.

13 posted on 05/20/2006 1:45:17 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

They never make sense.


14 posted on 05/20/2006 1:46:49 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
“If I were making the long-term decision, I’d announce, you know, hopefully it’s a temporary measure, and we can take it down as soon as we have enough people, and we’ve established a process where we’ve reduced the level.

Take it down? What a complete idiot. I guess he was for the fence, but later will be against it.

16 posted on 05/20/2006 1:48:32 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Hehe. I had to go back and look. I "assumed" it was Scrappleface.


20 posted on 05/20/2006 1:51:04 PM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

Wet finger-in-the-wind again Kerry, always wants it both ways.


21 posted on 05/20/2006 1:52:30 PM PDT by jazusamo (-- Married a WAC in '65 and I'm still reenlisting. :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

What utter nonsense! This guy definitely has an advanced case of Washheimer's Disease, which is characterized by the ability to speak for hours on any subject without saying anything meaningful or useful.


22 posted on 05/20/2006 1:57:27 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Memo to GOP: Don't ask me for any more money until you secure our Southern border.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
“If I were making the long-term decision, I’d announce, you know, hopefully it’s a temporary measure, and we can take it down as soon as we have enough people, and we’ve established a process where we’ve reduced the level.

What is he smoking? BTW, I'm sure Heinze doesn't have any illegals on their payroll, right?

23 posted on 05/20/2006 1:58:18 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
I might be wrong but the fervency of some Democrats and RINOS for the amnesty legislation S2611 has lost a lot of it's original shine.

The Democrats as opposed to the Republican RINOS are reading the adverse poll numbers to this fiasco known as amnesty immigration reform or SHAMNESTY.

When the old people who belong to AARP and other retired groups get word (and they will) that this bill allows felons to draw and possibly destabilize their Social Security, then all hell may break loose again.

Democrats may owe allegiance to many extreme radical groups but many of those extreme radicals also draw Social Security and other benefits threatened by this idiocy known as Amnesty for Illegal Aliens.

Just My Opinion.

KOOL AID drinkers and open border advocates go ahead an flame away.
24 posted on 05/20/2006 2:01:10 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt; CMS; The Sailor; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; Defender2; OneLoyalAmerican; bkwells; blacklions; ...

NOTE : For those on the far left AND far right
you'll have to put up with me exposing
hanoi kerry EVERY chance I get!

Too bad you believe that the Swift Boat Vets
were wrong and hanoi kerry was right.

Too bad you condone a low life traitor in the US Senate.

Well I don't and never will!

The "war" for the truth was NOT won on Nov 2 2004,
the "war" still continues with the empowerment by
those who refuse to bring justice to hanoi kerry.




I VOW to the 58,000 + Brothers and Sisters on
The Viet Nam Wall who never came home
and to those who died at home from injuries and
from broken hearts.

"I will do everything I LEGALLY can
to expose Hanoi Kerry once and for all.

I will not tire, I will not falter,
and I will not fail.

I solemnly vow to do all I can to restore your honor
until I give my last breath on earth."

http://www.freerepublic.com/~6869tonkingulfyachtc/




hanoi kerry and his own War Crimes in Vietnam

He was in command of a Swift Boat
and ordered his men to do these things.
Listen to this 1971 audio clip in hanoi kerry's own words.

Listen Here

http://www.streamload.com/jmstein77/Kerry2.mp3

hanoi kerry went before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations in 1971
to accuse the United States military
of committing massive numbers of war crimes in Vietnam.

hanoi kerry 1971 TESTIMONY

http://www.c-span.org/vote2004/jkerrytestimony.asp

Legislative Proposals Relating to the War in Southeast Asia Thursday, April 22, 1971
United States Senate, Committee on Foreign Relations, Washington, D.C.




There is no need to impeach Hanoi Kerry from the US Senate

He is there illegally!

WAKEUP AMERICA!

For those who "forgot" what Hanoi Kerry
did in the past read on and learn the truth.

Hanoi Kerry was still a USNR officer while he:
gave false hearsay testimony to Congress
negotiated with the enemy
helped the US lose a war
abetted in the deaths of millions
created a hostile environment for all servicemen

Why is Kerry still in the US Senate?
This is in violation of
U.S. Constitution Amendment 14 Sec 3 (1868)

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress,
or elector of President and Vice President,
or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States,
or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath,
as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer
of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States,
shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same,

or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.html




The FBI has proof of his giving aid and comfort to the enemies

Hanoi Kerry Timeline of a traitor
includes FBI files

May 1970
Kerry and Julia traveled to Paris, France and met with Madame Nguyen Thi Binh, the Foreign Minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of Vietnam (PRG), the political wing of the Vietcong, and other Viet Cong and Communist Vietnamese representatives to the Paris peace talks, a trip he now calls a "fact-finding" mission.

(U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953, declares it illegal for a U.S. citizen to go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power.)

http://www.archive-news.net/Kerry/JK_timeline.html




a) A person charged with absence without leave or missing movement in time of war,

or with any offense punishable by death,

may be tried at any time without limitation.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm#*%20843.%20ART.%2043.%20STATUTE%20OF%20LIMITATIONS




904. ART. 104. AIDING THE ENEMY

Any person who--

(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or

(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or [protects or gives intelligence to or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;
shall suffer death
or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct.

http://www.military-network.com/main_ucmj/SUBCHAPTERX.html#904.104





26 posted on 05/20/2006 2:12:15 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Support the troops by exposing the threats to them like hanoi kerry, Medea Benjamin and Code Pink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt
booo...


Yooo Hooo... I'm over HERE!!!
27 posted on 05/20/2006 2:12:19 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bitt

32 posted on 05/20/2006 2:20:03 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson