Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

No, but a vote for the President doesn't require absolute unquestioning assent to wrong-headed policy. That's why there was revolt of Harriet Miers and why there is revolt now. It's what happens when you choose between the lesser of two evils at election time. A lot of conservatives are realizing that by constantly settling for half a loaf, they wind up with crumbs at the end of the day.


9 posted on 05/19/2006 3:06:54 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: MarcusTulliusCicero
I wish I had a nickle for every time I've heard,"he promised" here on FR only to find out he never did. The beauty of our system is we have primaries and elections every scheduled time for the position. The Harriet Miers argument is really not a good one because she is not the first SC nominee that went through that type of rebellion then withdrawal but it seems as though President Bush is the only one that no one will give a break to on that issue.
18 posted on 05/19/2006 3:15:48 PM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson