Posted on 05/18/2006 6:22:58 AM PDT by freepatriot32
That is not what he said. He said he would sign it if Congress reauthorized it.
Oh, and 99% of Americans are neither pro-gun nor pro-2d. I would say 55-60% tops.
The ATF is the last bastion of Clintonistas.
When has anyone ever heard of Bush putting conservatives in charge of this runaway domestic terrorist group?
I totally agree with that. Sorry if I was misleading.
It's also unusual to have that many crime-scene gun traces, too....one in eight?
I have been driving for 45 years and have NEVER been pulled over without legitimate cause. Perhaps you should remove the "Cops Are Pigs" bumpersticker off your car.
At least she wasn't charged with "Mopery with Intent to gawk." Seriously though I am sorry to hear of your troubles.
The BATFags should not even EXIST. It is not now or ever any business of the government who has sold what firearm to whom, period. If someone commits a crime using a weapon, PUNISH THE CRIME. Alcohol, Tobacci, Firearms and Explosives should be on a convnience store menu, NOT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY!
"Not so idiotic as to Bush is not pro 2d amendment or to believe in the Globaloney crap the kooks try and peddle to the gullible.
As I said "you don't even know what a globalist is"."
You lack coherency.
Again, if Bush is pro 2nd then why does he allow the ATF to run wild?
Globalism is real, read the newspaper, read UN announcements, look at the world around you. You might cut down on the booze too.
The whole concept of having one bureau oversee booze, guns, and cigars seems amazing to me, anyway. It sounds like a role John Belushi was born to play.
It is extremely clear that the Globaloneyists don't have a clue and their crackpot political theories are more full of holes than a slice of swiss cheese. You are no exception as your inability to tell me what a "globalist" is shows. Beyond being a nice nonsensical buzz word favored by those lacking in fundamental understanding of political economy the word has no meaning to serious students of world affairs.
It is like an animist belief that Evil Spirits control affairs and is persisted in by those with a preference for kook theories rather than scientific and logical analysis.
You must have clicked on a different link. The link in my post 27 goes straight to the radio interview i just clicked it and listened to it again
"It is extremely clear that the Globaloneyists don't have a clue and their crackpot political theories are more full of holes than a slice of swiss cheese"
ok, so put down that beer and name one of those theories that are full of holes. Then provide a source where I support that theory.
"Beyond being a nice nonsensical buzz word favored by those lacking in fundamental understanding of political economy the word has no meaning to serious students of world affairs."
And an ostrich thinks its invisible when its really only hiding its head.
"It is like an animist belief that Evil Spirits control affairs and is persisted in by those with a preference for kook theories rather than scientific and logical analysis."
You're good with name calling but seriously lacking in facts. Again, put down the beer professor. Your argument may be adequate in the academic world but it doesnt make it out here in the real world.
Conversely, if you want off my ping-list, let me know.
And my apologies for any redundant pings.
Actually, there is. A gun store owner can go online and enter all the information that you fill out in your paperwork. However, ATF still requires paper hardcopies of everything and the little book has to be filled out too.
Actually, the area that my brother-in-law's store is at is a very high crime area in Arizona. I don't have any statistics, but I would guess that the crime rate is worse in his area than in San Francisco, and would probably rival some of the areas in East Oakland... Crime is definitely an ongoing concern of the residents there.
Then all they need to do is arbitrarily change the law again requiring all transfers be done through a then non-existant dealer.
Knee jerk reaction.
I should also add that I defintiely agree with you in that the statistic is somewhat meaningless without a comparison of other store statistics in the Bay Area... Still 1 in 8 sounds like a lot to me just off the top of my head. But if I were to learn that all the Bay Area stores have around a 1 in 10 rate, I wouldn't see that as that bad. However, if other stores are closer to 1 in 50 or less, then that would indicate to me that criminals are selecting this store disproportionately to purchase their guns, and I would have to ask why. If they are consistently not sending in correct paperwork or allowing customers to get away with a little fudging of data on their applications,it would make it harder to trace weapons that were used in a crime,and that could be a reason for the high crime stats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.