Skip to comments.
A Smelly NSA 'Scoop' at USA Today
The National Ledger ^
| 05-17-06
| Cliff Kincaid
Posted on 05/17/2006 11:34:48 AM PDT by Coastal
Harry Jaffe of The Washingtonian has written that USA Today reporter Leslie Cauleys story about how the NSA collected average citizens phone records from their telecommunications companies, like AT&T and Verizon, was a real scoop. He says other papers have been scrambling to keep up, and that USA Today has arrived on the national scene with this blockbuster. But it looks like Jaffeand USA Todaymay have gotten the basic facts wrong. The USA Today story, based entirely on anonymous sources, has been seriously challenged.
We should be asking: a scoop of what? Something about this scoop doesnt smell right.
Cauley is quoted by Jaffe as saying that her NSA story further validates the use of confidential, unnamed sources. They have a real value in our business. Well, not so fast. Verizon has released a statement noting that...
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalledger.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: liberalmedia; mediabias; nsa; usatoday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
05/17/2006 11:34:49 AM PDT
by
Coastal
To: Coastal
I hear USA Today would neither confirm or deny that they had been had! bwahahahaha!
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Coastal
USAToday's "Rathergate". They will never learn that they can't present a story as fact just because they wish it was true. All they had to do was call the companies they accused of giving over records. They didn't even check the first fact, it appears.
4
posted on
05/17/2006 11:37:38 AM PDT
by
L98Fiero
(I'm worth a million in prizes.)
To: Coastal
Karl Rove. Enough said. Has he cranked up the Hurricane machine yet?
5
posted on
05/17/2006 11:38:37 AM PDT
by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: Coastal
I have over 1000 anonymous sources who say the USA Today is a piece of turd rag.
To: lexington minuteman 1775
7
posted on
05/17/2006 11:40:20 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
To: Coastal
This whole big deal has a kind of Rovrian quality about it.
Get the Rats to big time face time huffery and puffery; then remind them that they were briefed many times; only to have the whole episode cancelled for lack of leak.
"Oh, wait a minute, I didn't know what I didn't know that I didn't talk about."
8
posted on
05/17/2006 11:43:49 AM PDT
by
aShepard
(-)
To: Always Right
LOL. Once again, you are ALWAYS RIGHT!
And to think of all those poor, deluded souls out there that read it like it was the Bible. You just know they are out there...
Pathetic. The Wishing-Makes-It-So Media strikes again.
Dinah
9
posted on
05/17/2006 11:44:14 AM PDT
by
Dinah Lord
(fighting the Islamic Jihad - one keystroke at a time...)
To: Always Right
To: lexington minuteman 1775
Maybe they got it from Leopold's source. Rove was indicted Monday, right?
11
posted on
05/17/2006 11:58:27 AM PDT
by
GOP_Proud
(After midnight, alcohol, frat boys, a stripper...no good can come from it.)
To: Coastal
12
posted on
05/17/2006 11:58:49 AM PDT
by
pissant
To: L98Fiero
(USA) Todays Gaggle
13
posted on
05/17/2006 11:59:03 AM PDT
by
Foolsgold
(dumped daschel he he he he)
To: Always Right
It may be, but it is delivered gratis in hotels across this country. It is also the ubiquitous paper in every airport.
Think about it.
14
posted on
05/17/2006 12:01:03 PM PDT
by
sauropod
("Heaven on my left, Hell on my right and the Angel of Death behind me" - Dune)
To: Baynative
USA Today is not a newspaper. Its a cartoon.
To: Coastal
To all
USA Today is the newspaper of choice for the illiterati !
My guess is its written at the 3rd or 4th grade level.
It makes Reader's Digest look like the Encyclopedia Britannica !
16
posted on
05/17/2006 12:18:12 PM PDT
by
Reily
To: saganite
Wax on. Wax off.
17
posted on
05/17/2006 12:20:46 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Coastal
I am sick of these "anonymous sources" its all bull*** made up or lies repeated, how can they print whats amounts to rumors...they are digging their own media grave here.
To: Coastal
I think the USA Today got "Dan Rathered"
19
posted on
05/17/2006 12:40:11 PM PDT
by
skimask
(People who care what you do don't matter.......People who matter don't care what you do.)
To: lexington minuteman 1775
I hear USA Today would neither confirm or deny that they had been had! bwahahahaha! Since the phone companies may be sued for billions over this stuff USA Today is in deep trouble. They can admit their source and say we messed up or be in a cross-complaint in the suits against the phone companies.
20
posted on
05/17/2006 12:47:57 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson