To: calcowgirl
"The Governor's pledge to lower greenhouse gas emissions in California to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 will bring Californians little or no environmental benefit, while costing the citizenry a substantial amount of money."In other words, why get into that messy business of cutting spending and reducing the size of state government when you can do something "green" instead that is bound to find favor with the environmental wackos.
He deserves the election loss he's headed toward.
11 posted on
05/17/2006 3:32:13 PM PDT by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Czar
In other words, why get into that messy business of cutting spending and reducing the size of state government when you can do something "green" instead ... Or... why bother being fiscally responsible and using that tax revenue for things like infrastructure when you can borrow the money and sell in to the electorate in another deceptive campaign and have all of this green mumbo-jumbo at the same time? Never mind the negative impact to economic factors pointed out in the article. Apparently following the Euorpean model is Arnold's agenda.
12 posted on
05/17/2006 4:39:51 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson