To: new yorker 77
Will the supreme court ever take up Nix v. Hedden?
2 posted on
05/15/2006 11:37:03 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(Durham - The San Francisco of North Carolina)
To: new yorker 77
Let's re-visit:
Eminent Domain
Campaign Finance
Abortion
5 posted on
05/15/2006 11:43:32 AM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
To: new yorker 77
There might be legal precedent! Of course, Landsnatching . . . land, land, Land, see Snatch. Ah, Haley vs. United States. Haley: 7, United States: nothing. You see, it can be done!
To: new yorker 77
I've heard about this from those in legal circles. It was a major reversal of laws passed over the past two or three decades permitting and extending the use of hearsay testimony.
14 posted on
05/15/2006 12:18:07 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi 2006 | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson